My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-11-08_REVISION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-11-08_REVISION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2020 4:38:14 PM
Creation date
11/9/2016 10:15:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/8/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Newmont / CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR83
Email Name
TC1
ERR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NEWMONT, <br /> rb•wnl:nll Mllniljy(.roluu,du,n <br /> G3G3 Soulil f 1,1rI!eer s Grc-�n Cln b:' Adl 8n'I <br /> G«-e;l;tco.i Vlq i[> CO 8n1 I I <br /> 1 719 C' 7977 <br /> f �19 f d9 3254 <br /> SENT CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED <br /> 7015-1660-0000-0779-7594 <br /> November 8, 2016 RECEIVED <br /> Vim emc,(I <br /> Mr. Elliott Russell NOV 0 8 2016 <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist <br /> Colorado Department of Natural Resources DIVISION OF RECLAMATION <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety MINING AND SAFETY <br /> Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> Re: Permit No. M-1980-244; Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company("CC&V"); <br /> Cresson Project; — Response to DRMS Technical Revision (TR-83) Second Adequacy <br /> Review for Squaw Gulch Valley Leach Facility (SGVLF) Haul Route to Phase I <br /> Dear Mr. Russell: <br /> Following the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety's(DRMS)November 7, 2016 letter <br /> for additional adequacy review comments of technical revision TR-83, please see CC&V's <br /> response to comments in bold and DRMS comments in italics. <br /> Comment 1: Please provide a technical justification for not lining the approximately <br /> 1,200feet of unlined haul road between the LOB and the SGVLF. Please explain how <br /> CC'&V plans to prevent, control, and mitigate releases of designated chemicals on this <br /> section of unlined haul road <br /> Response 1: <br /> Installation of liner under the haul road between LOB and SGVLF is impractical <br /> and would create safety concerns for CC&V's haul truck operators including <br /> geotechnical instability. In addition, liner placed beneath the haul road is at risk of <br /> being compromised due to ground pressure exerted by haul truck traffic if less than <br /> 20 feet of cover material is used. <br /> CC&V plans to prevent, control, and mitigate any extremely minor potential <br /> releases of designated chemical to this section of unlined haul road using the <br /> approach outlined in CC&V's November 2,2016 correspondence with DRMS. As <br /> part of CC&V's Spill Prevention, Containment and Countermeasures (SPCC) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.