My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-11-07_ENFORCEMENT - C1992081
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1992081
>
2016-11-07_ENFORCEMENT - C1992081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2016 9:12:11 AM
Creation date
11/9/2016 7:49:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
11/7/2016
Doc Name
Letter Regarding Violation
From
Hayden Gulch Terminal, LLC
To
DRMS
Violation No.
CV2016002
Email Name
JHB
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that occurred was localized grading of the access points to RCR37 to provide for a smooth transition (see <br />attached photos). While equipment traffic in these areas impacted the grass stubble remaining after the hay had <br />been cut, the equipment and materials staging activities resulted in no environmental impacts, and the grass in <br />the staging areas will regrow when our leasee tills and plants the fields in the spring. <br />Our rationale in stating that the NOV is unwarranted is based on the considerations explained above, and the <br />fact that a contractor could stage materials and equipment in a contractors yard for a project (even disturbing <br />some additional area in the yard), with no consequence or penalty. Given that the staging areas which were used <br />are owned by Peabody, we find it difficult to understand why similar considerations would not apply, especially <br />since the staging areas are small, the disturbance did not involve any earthwork, is temporary, and will be <br />addressed through the existing land management practices and plans. <br />If, as the proposed abatement requirements indicate, HGT were required to modify the permit area through a <br />permit revision to incorporate the staging areas and reclamation and seeding plans and bond, HGT would then <br />be faced with a new 10 -year reclamation obligation (for an area of about 1.5 acres that is seasonally cropped for <br />hay) at the same time that we are working hard to address and reduce liabilities. Given the circumstances, we're <br />sure you can understand our concerns. <br />We appreciate your continuing support and assistance, and know that you will give this matter your careful and <br />thoughtful consideration. After you have opportunity to review, please feel free to contact me with any <br />questions, or to discuss. <br />Best regards, <br />for Hayden Gulch Terminal, LLC <br />M. e eton <br />F <br />cc: Pat Sollars/Peabody <br />Bryce West/Peabody <br />Brian Watterson/Peabody <br />Miranda Blomquist/Peabody <br />Janet Binns/CDRMS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.