My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-11-04_INSPECTION - M1982155
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1982155
>
2016-11-04_INSPECTION - M1982155
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2016 1:17:17 PM
Creation date
11/4/2016 1:12:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982155
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
11/4/2016
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Schmidt Construction Company
Inspection Date
5/26/2016
Email Name
TC1
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERMIT #: M-1982-155 <br />INSPECTOR’S INITIALS: TC1 <br />INSPECTION DATE: May 26, 2016 <br /> <br /> <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />removed this stipulation from the permit. The permit was transferred to Schmidt Construction <br />in (SO-02) in 2001. <br /> Commitments/Stipulations: ST-01 was removed from the permit as described above. <br /> Other Records <br />a) The total permitted area is 742.8 acres (including the 49.8 acres approved in AM-03), the 2015 annual <br />report indicated 351 acres of disturbance. This includes the ~63 acres in the northeast portion of the <br />permit area that appeared to be ready for release. <br />b) The previous inspection was performed on 10/28/2011. No problems were cited. <br />c) The anniversary date is December 31. Annual reports and fees are current through 2015. <br />d) The post-mine land use is rangeland. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 1. Google Earth image of northeast reclaimed pit. <br /> <br />Bond: <br />The Division will need to update the bond for the site to address AM-03 if the MLRB approves reconsideration <br />of the 2012 approval of AM-03. <br /> <br />Summary and Recommendations: <br />1. No problems were cited during the inspection. <br />2. The Operator will need to request reconsideration from the MLRB for AM -03 because the financial
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.