Laserfiche WebLink
MEMO <br />Species Diversity <br />The species diversity standard for the Rangeland Reclaimed Areas, as stated in the permit, is the <br />establishment of two cool -season grasses, two warm -season grasses, and one perennial forb, each with a <br />relative cover value between 5 and 60 percent. <br />The species diversity standard on the Rangeland Reclaimed Areas was not achieved during the sampling <br />event. Two cool -season grasses did satisfy the permit standard: western wheatgrass (21.21 %) and <br />thickspike wheatgrass (24.75%). The warm -season grasses standard was not met, with the two most <br />abundant warm -season grasses below the requisite 5% cover, with blue grama and sideoats grama <br />representing 3.54% and 2.53%, cover, respectively. Finally, the perennial forb standard was not satisfied, <br />with Drummond's milkvetch as the most abundant perennial forb at 2.53% cover. <br />Data sheets from the site visit are included in Attachment 1. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Based on the results shown above, plant cover at the Golden Eagle Mine Rangeland Reclamation Area <br />did not meet Phase III bond clearance criteria for cover, biomass or species diversity. To meet the <br />minimum allowable cover for the reclaimed site (i.e. within 90% of the reference area cover), mean <br />vegetation cover in the reclaimed site would need to increase to 33.7% (a 33% increase relative to its <br />current state). To meet the required 90% production benchmark, mean vegetation production in the <br />reclaimed site would need to increase to 33.4 g m-2 (a 14% increase relative to its current state). Finally, <br />to meet the species diversity requirements, two warm season grasses need to increase in cover to a <br />minimum of 5%, up from 2.5% and 3.5% for the two most abundant species in this category currently on <br />the reclaimed site. Similarly, a perennial forb must increase to 5% cover, up from 1.5% or 2.5% for the two <br />most abundant species at this time. Perennial cool season grass cover is currently sufficient for Phase III <br />bond clearance species diversity requirements. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Comparison of the reference and reclaimed sites indicates substantial differences in the structure and <br />composition of the vegetation community between the sites. Plant cover, biomass and species diversity <br />are all short of Phase III bond clearance guidelines, though notably plant cover represents the biggest <br />discrepancy between reference and reclaimed sites. Given that the required number of cool and warm <br />season grasses and perennial forbs are already established in the reclaimed area, albeit at insufficient <br />abundances at this time, and given the relatively small difference in production between the two sites <br />(-4% short of meeting production requirements), it is likely that increasing cover in the reclaimed site to <br />meet bond release guidelines will result in meeting all requirements for production and diversity. It is worth <br />arcadis.com Page: <br />5/6 <br />Standard <br />Null <br />Standard <br />Null Hypothesis <br />Mean <br />Hypothesis <br />Mean <br />Deviation <br />Deviation <br />Test Result <br />Test Result <br />Rangeland <br />Reference Area <br />36.93 7.96 <br />37.07 11.61 <br />Rangeland <br />25.33 5.79 <br />Reject <br />29.28 11.69 <br />Reject <br />Reclaimed Area <br />Species Diversity <br />The species diversity standard for the Rangeland Reclaimed Areas, as stated in the permit, is the <br />establishment of two cool -season grasses, two warm -season grasses, and one perennial forb, each with a <br />relative cover value between 5 and 60 percent. <br />The species diversity standard on the Rangeland Reclaimed Areas was not achieved during the sampling <br />event. Two cool -season grasses did satisfy the permit standard: western wheatgrass (21.21 %) and <br />thickspike wheatgrass (24.75%). The warm -season grasses standard was not met, with the two most <br />abundant warm -season grasses below the requisite 5% cover, with blue grama and sideoats grama <br />representing 3.54% and 2.53%, cover, respectively. Finally, the perennial forb standard was not satisfied, <br />with Drummond's milkvetch as the most abundant perennial forb at 2.53% cover. <br />Data sheets from the site visit are included in Attachment 1. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Based on the results shown above, plant cover at the Golden Eagle Mine Rangeland Reclamation Area <br />did not meet Phase III bond clearance criteria for cover, biomass or species diversity. To meet the <br />minimum allowable cover for the reclaimed site (i.e. within 90% of the reference area cover), mean <br />vegetation cover in the reclaimed site would need to increase to 33.7% (a 33% increase relative to its <br />current state). To meet the required 90% production benchmark, mean vegetation production in the <br />reclaimed site would need to increase to 33.4 g m-2 (a 14% increase relative to its current state). Finally, <br />to meet the species diversity requirements, two warm season grasses need to increase in cover to a <br />minimum of 5%, up from 2.5% and 3.5% for the two most abundant species in this category currently on <br />the reclaimed site. Similarly, a perennial forb must increase to 5% cover, up from 1.5% or 2.5% for the two <br />most abundant species at this time. Perennial cool season grass cover is currently sufficient for Phase III <br />bond clearance species diversity requirements. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Comparison of the reference and reclaimed sites indicates substantial differences in the structure and <br />composition of the vegetation community between the sites. Plant cover, biomass and species diversity <br />are all short of Phase III bond clearance guidelines, though notably plant cover represents the biggest <br />discrepancy between reference and reclaimed sites. Given that the required number of cool and warm <br />season grasses and perennial forbs are already established in the reclaimed area, albeit at insufficient <br />abundances at this time, and given the relatively small difference in production between the two sites <br />(-4% short of meeting production requirements), it is likely that increasing cover in the reclaimed site to <br />meet bond release guidelines will result in meeting all requirements for production and diversity. It is worth <br />arcadis.com Page: <br />5/6 <br />