My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-10-20_REVISION - C1981018 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2016-10-20_REVISION - C1981018 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2016 8:15:57 AM
Creation date
10/21/2016 7:42:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/20/2016
Doc Name
Review & Miscellaneous
From
Rob Zuber
To
Clayton Wein
Type & Sequence
TR70
Email Name
CCW
RDZ
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO <br />Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining and Safety <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Interoffice Memorandum <br />To: <br />Clayton Wein <br />From: <br />Rob Zuber <br />Date: <br />10/20/2016 <br />Subject: <br />Deserado TR -70: SEDCAD review and miscellaneous <br />Hello, Clayton. <br />I have reviewed the TR -70 submittal from Blue Mountain Energy, in particular the SEDCAD <br />model (Illustration 57). 1 have the following comments (and I e-mailed all but last to Scott <br />Wanstedt). <br />SEDCAD review <br />• Pond nomenclature is inconsistent between Map 160 and SEDCAD output. For example, <br />"Pond #2" on Map 160 is the same as "Pond #1" (Structure 3) in the SEDCAD run. Please <br />revise one or the other. <br />• Structure #5, SWS #3 appears to be the pond itself as the time of concentration is 0.0 or <br />non-existent in the model tables. If this is correct, please explain why this method was <br />not implemented for the other ponds. <br />• There are discharge pond dewater times above 13,000 hours. How were these <br />determined and what is significance for the overall model? <br />• For the 10 -year model, there are particle size distributions for each structure. Please <br />explain why the sediment entering Structure #3 contains much finer material than the <br />sediment entering Structure #5. (From Structure #5 to Structure #7 there is very little <br />change in the sediment.) <br />Other comments <br />• Map 160 shows boreholes SH -4a and SH -4d, but Map 147 shows SH -4. Please explain <br />the difference. <br />On Map 160, the riprap depths and gravel filter layer depths for the channels are <br />designated as only a few inches deep. Should this be deeper? (We discussed this.) <br />%F_co<-0 <br />w t\ <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 P 303.866.3567 F 303.832.8106 http://mining. state. co. us <br />John W. Hickenlooper, Governor I Robert W. Randall, Executive Director I Virginia Brannon, Director .1876 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.