Laserfiche WebLink
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OFPUBLIC HEALThiAiYD MNWROIVMENT, Water Quality Control Division <br />Rw(Mak Page 6, 0004500000 Sond mid Gravel General Permit <br />exempted from an antidegradation review. Based on the information and data to the application, the permit writer will make an <br />assessment of the low flow dilution ratio of the discharge to determine if anddegradadon applies. <br />Under this general permit an antidegradation (AD) limit will be calculated as 1 S% of the Water Quality Standard T h pen. .re <br />would then have the choice of this AD limit, or of a non - impact limitation (AM). Me NIL is either the limitation contained as of <br />September 2000, or may be deterndned by the use of an implicit limitation #a previous limit did not exist. The implicit limit is <br />determined as the maximum effluent concentration in the years prior to September 2000 (later data may be substituted on a case bj <br />case basis if data a unavailable from this time period). Alternately, if data does not exist, a compliance schedule may be added to <br />the permit to obtain such data, to determine the implicit limitation and the final antidegradadon -based effluent limit. An individual <br />permit will be required where the permittee requests consideration of dilution and ambient water quality. <br />In addition, the pa mittee may elect to perform an alternatives analysis. As this may be subject to public notice requirements, an <br />individual permit will be required. See Regulation 31.8(3)(4) and the Division's Antidegradation Guidance document for more <br />information regarding an alternatives analysis. <br />g. Whole Effluent ToxiM (W 7) — The Water Quality Control Division has established the use of WET testing as a method for <br />identifying and controlling toxic discharges from wastewater treatment facilities. WET testing is being utilized as a means to <br />ensure that there are no discharges ofpoilwants "in amounts, concentrations or combinations which are harmful to the beneficial <br />uses or toxic to humans, animals, plants, or aquatic life" as required by Section 31.11(1) of the Basic Standards and <br />Methodologies for Surface Waters. <br />Some discharges covered under this general permit may exhibit whole effluent toxicity based on the potential pollutant <br />concentrations in the discharge. Aus, WET testing maybe incorporated into the permit on a case -by -case basis. If it is <br />determined that WET testing is required, Chronic WET testing will normally be incorporated into the permit. However, Acute <br />testing may be applied where the receiving stream has a zero low flow in all months 04 the discharge is intermittent, or when <br />deemed appropriate for any other saaVecific reason. <br />h. wed and EnAawa- The US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Division have entered into a Memorandum of <br />Agreement (MOA) regarding discharges to federal MBE waters. In this MOA, a permittee that discharges to a ME water r <br />have additional constraints placed upon the discharge. These constraints may include accepting end-of -pipe limitations (& <br />dilution), moving the discharge point to a different location, or using a diffuser to obtain instantaneous mixing of the effluent and <br />the receiving water. This last option may allow for a portion of the available assimilative capacity (dilution) to be incorporated hm <br />thepermit. However, as this is a generalpermit, all limitations are imposed as end-of -pipe limits, and therefore, the first option is <br />met: Generally, it will be assumed that the end -of -pipe limitations will satisfy the MOA, and no further consideration is needed. Ot <br />a case -by -case basis, additional constraints may need to be evaluated <br />h. Mi4a Zones — Under this generalpermit mixing zone regulations do not apply, as the water quality standards are applied as the <br />effluent limits(Le, no dilution is allowed). <br />Dish tomes to 3030 Listed Waters — Where the receiving water is included on the state's 303(d) list, total maximum daily <br />loads (TMDLs) are being developed in accordance with the Division's schedule for TMDL completion. Once a TMDL has been <br />established, if it is necessary to incorporate limitations for a facility certified under this general permit, based upon the <br />outcomes of the TMDL or the results of the data analysis, a modification to the certification to discharge, or an individual <br />permit may be required to regulate discharges from a facility. Ae facility would continue to be covered under this general <br />permit certification until the individual permit is issued <br />For example, the industrial process of sand and gravel operations typically involves discharging alluvial water. When the <br />alluvium is dewatered in an area of shale deposits (e.g. Mancos), selenium is likely to be present in elevated concentrations in <br />the discharge and is automatically considered a pollutant of concern. Preliminary monitoring data indicates that operations it <br />areas ofshale are likely contributing to exceedances ofstream standards for selenium, and therefore, monitoring requirements <br />will be included for data collection for a future reasonable potential analysis. New discharges to these segments will be <br />required to meet the water quality limitations for selenium upon commencement of discharge. The basic standards for selenium <br />are found in Table III of The Basic Standards and Methodologies1gr Surface Water (S CCR 1002.31). <br />There are currently ongoing national discussions between the USEPA and the USFWS on appropriate aquatic life standards <br />for selenium. Should the USEPA adopt new water quality standards for selenium, the division's standards unit will beg <br />incorporating federal standards into Colorado's water quality standards during basin triennial reviews. In the future, <br />treatment of effluent to remove selenium may be required to attain water quality standards. <br />