Laserfiche WebLink
PART <br />Page Na I <br />Permit Na COG-50000, <br />i One hundred micrograms per liter (100 no); <br />ii. Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 ug/l) for acrolem and acrylonitrile; five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug/1) for 2.4 <br />dinitrophenol and 2- methyl4.6- dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (1 mng/1) for antimony; <br />iii. Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance with Sectiol <br />61.4(2)(g). <br />iv. The level established by the Division in accordance with 40 CFR - 122.44(f). <br />b. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non - routine or infrequent basis, of a toxi <br />pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed time highest of the following "notification levels' <br />i. Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 ug/1); <br />ii. One milligram per liter (1 mgA) for antimony; and <br />iii. Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application. <br />iv. The level established by time Division in accordance with 40 C FR' 122.44(f). <br />6. Bypass Notification <br />If the pmm ittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, a notice shall be submitted, at least ten days before the date of the bypass, t <br />the Division. The bypass shall be subject to Division approval and limitations imposed by the Division. Violations of requirement <br />imposed by the Division will constitute a violation of this permit. <br />7. lip= <br />a. Effect of an Upset. <br />An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with permit effluent limitations if th <br />requirements of paragraph (b) of this section are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims thf <br />noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to judicial reviev <br />b. Conditions Necessary for a Demonstration of Upset <br />A pamuttee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate through properly signed contemporaneot <br />operating logs, or other relevant evidence that <br />i. An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the specific cause(s) of the upset; and <br />ii. The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated and maintained; and <br />iii. The permittee submitted proper notice of the upset as required in Part HA.4. of this permit (24 -hour notice); and <br />iv. The permittee complied with any remedial measure necessary to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or disposal <br />violation of this permit, which has a reason able likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. <br />In addition to the demonstration required above, a permiuee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset for a violatic <br />ofefiluent limitations based upon water quality standards shall also demonstrate through monitoring, modeling or other methods th <br />the relevant standards were achieved in the receiving water. <br />c. Burden of Proof <br />In any enforcement proceeding, the perminee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. <br />8. _Dige1$oint <br />Any discharge to the waters of the State from a point source other than specifically authorized by this permit is prohibited. <br />9. Prouer n#22 and Maintenance <br />