My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-10-05_REVISION - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-10-05_REVISION - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2020 11:04:37 PM
Creation date
10/14/2016 11:16:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/5/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Newmont
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(/ <br /> NEWMONT RECEIVED <br /> Newmont Mining Corporation <br /> ' 0 20 6363 South Fiddler's Green Circle,Suite 800 <br /> OCT16 Greenwood Village CO 80111 <br /> T 719-689-7977 <br /> l�O REMANOT�fy! P 719- 54 <br /> AINA&A � www newmcwmont com <br /> SENT CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED <br /> 7015-1660-0000-0779-7426 <br /> October 12, 2016 <br /> Mr. Timothy Cazier, P.E. <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist <br /> Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> Re: Permit No. M-1980-244• Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company "CC&V" <br /> Cresson Project; y4tesponse to DRMS Technical Revision (TR-85) Preliminary Adequacy <br /> Review for the High Grade Mill Permanent Fresh Water Line Reroute <br /> Dear Mr. Cazier: <br /> As a follow up to Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety's (DRMS) October 12th letter for <br /> preliminary adequacy review comments of technical revision TR-85. Please see DRMS <br /> comments in italics below with Newmont's response to comments in bold. <br /> Comment 1: Pipe Specifications <br /> This section lists the maximum pressure at the pump as 224 psig. However, no pipe <br /> specifications are provided. Please provide specs/pressure rating for the proposed 8-inch carbon <br /> steel and HDPE pipe. <br /> Response 1: <br /> Please see attached documents providing specifications and pressure ratings for the 8-inch <br /> carbon steel and HDPE pipe. <br /> Comment 2: Pipe Reroute <br /> The proximity of the toe of the ECOSA to Grassy Valley combined with the alignment of the pipeline <br /> raises concerns about the potential for corrosion of the new pipeline. Please address the need for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.