Rationale for Recommendation to Approve 31
<br /> September 29, 2016
<br /> In Exhibit 6.5,the application describes the geotechnical investigations that have occurred on the proposed
<br /> mine site. Norwest Corporation carried out a site investigation in 2015, where a total of seven boreholes
<br /> were advanced to depths of 200 feet to 800 feet below existing grades. Six of the boreholes were advanced
<br /> in the area north of Little Turkey Creek, and one borehole was advanced in the area south of Little Turkey
<br /> Creek. All boreholes were logged in the field by a Norwest geologist, collecting both geological and
<br /> geotechnical information. The logs of six additional boreholes, advanced by others during a previous site
<br /> investigation were made available to Norwest Corporation to aid in the geotechnical review. These
<br /> boreholes were advanced to shallower depths between 150 feet and 250 feet below existing grade, and
<br /> limited geotechnical information was collected. The investigation found that granite and granite
<br /> composites are more prevalent than any other major rock type within the proposed quarry and pit wall
<br /> locations. Approximately 81%of the rock encountered has been classified as granite or granite composite.
<br /> Detailed geophysical logs, drill hole lithology logs, and drill hole completion reports were included in
<br /> Exhibit 6.5.
<br /> In the Exhibit 6.5 portion of the adequacy review response submitted on July 14, 2016, the response to
<br /> item no. 19 confirms the Applicant recognizes that data is limited in the South Pit area. Information
<br /> gathered while mining the North Pit area will be evaluated and used to develop supplemental geotechnical
<br /> investigation for the South Pit.
<br /> As noted previously, the application includes a surface and groundwater monitoring plan sufficient to
<br /> verify the protection of surface and groundwater resources. The Division determined the permit
<br /> application satisfied the requirements of Rule 6.4.7, and the applicable performance standards of Rule 3.1.
<br /> 29. Concerns regarding the hazardous intersection of the proposed access road at Hwy 115 (too
<br /> close to Little Turkey Creek Road entrance off of Hwy 115; blind corner exists; should move access
<br /> road further south; is only a two-lane road here;proposed access point historically dangerous place)
<br /> (S.Fentman,J. Townsend,S.Bell,R.Eddy,S.Firks, W.Sheaves,A.Sheaves,A.Sickels, W.Baker,M.Baker,L.Pecoraro, C Reed,N.Reed,
<br /> W. Flaharty,J. Flaharty. B. Powell.B. Donahue, H.Sandler, B. Louzon, L.Louzon, G. Cousineau, C Cousineau,J. Rigdon, K.Rigdon, T.
<br /> Offutt,S.Diggs, W.Diggs,L.Steer,P. Ragan, C.Ragan, D. Martin, L.Martin, T. Hight,A.Fellows, T.Fellows, H. Wright. V. Wekamp, D.
<br /> Wekamp,E.Bransby,S.Boehr,M. Yugo vich, C Watkins,P. Watkins,J.McFarlane,R.Eddy Jr.,M.Heer, C.Heer,Raven Rudduck)
<br /> The Act and Rules do not specifically address traffic safety. Such issues are under the jurisdiction of El
<br /> Paso County and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). These issues should be addressed
<br /> through the permitting processes of El Paso County and CDOT.
<br /> 30. Concerns regarding the Emergency Action Plan submitted - should commit to notifying the
<br /> Division within 24 hours of a failure or imminent failure of an impoundment, embankment, stockpile,
<br /> or slope,per Rule 8; Concerns that the mining operation will increase fire risk/danger - Emergency
<br /> Action Plan should include response to wildfires
<br /> (C.Reed,N.Reed)(S. Harper,K.Rawson,S.Rawson, G.Klein,M.McClurg, C Reed,N.Reed, T.Day,B. Chisnell, T.Swonger,S.Sovaiko,
<br /> J. Gard,D. Gard,M.Hodges, G.Sovaiko,J. Miller,J.Salazar Jr.,S.Harper,M.Harper,Richard Rudduck,Joe Koscove,S. Koscove,Jack
<br /> Koscove,M.Koscove, L.Rogers,S.Samson)
<br /> Rule 8 —Emergency Notification by Operators, and Emergency Response Authority of the Office, is not
<br /> a required exhibit for a Construction Materials Permit application. This rule outlines emergency
<br /> notification procedures which are enforceable requirements for all approved permits. The Emergency
<br /> Action Plan submitted in Exhibit T is not a requirement for 112c permit applications.
<br /> 1313 S,eiiiran Street. Rennt 215, Deirvor, C0 80203 P 30s ,866.35b7 F 303.832.81%
<br /> I; n ii + �' r
<br /> 'ohn t',. Hickc,t auger. i:c�'r.'I�nor Roh_rt``! R<j�ri;.., Ext=tl.�ivF C� .ryctor Vir ';F�: 8r�t�.r.��, D�rectt�r
<br />
|