My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-09-30_REVISION - M2004061
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2004061
>
2016-09-30_REVISION - M2004061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 2:12:41 PM
Creation date
10/4/2016 3:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004061
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/30/2016
Doc Name
Notice of Application Consideration
From
Everist Materials, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SO1
Email Name
PSH
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Blasting Impacts and Rock Slope Stability Assessment for Cottonwood Quarry in Grand Cowdy, CO <br />the deer alight casually lift their heads and look toward the test site. However, they never ran <br />away or appeared otherwise bothered by the loud noise. It was obvious that, like the animals at <br />the Metro Washington Park Zoo in Portland, the deer bad become acclimatized to the blasting <br />noise. <br />For the past three years, the author has also been involved in an expansion project at the County <br />of Sonoma California Central Disposal Site in Petaluma, CA, where blasting has been regularly <br />occurred within 1,000 feet of dairy cows. Measurements in the cow pastures have indicated that <br />blast noise and vibration levels have been as high as 0.08 ints and I28 OL, respectively. Despite <br />initial concerns by the dairy operators, all involved parties have now concurred that the cows <br />have not been disturbed in any way by these blasting effects. <br />Based on the referenced studies and observations of the author at many other projects, blasting at <br />the Cottonwood Project will have little or no impact on domestic or wild animals near the site or <br />on neighboring properties. <br />4.5 Control of Dust <br />MSHA Hiles require the use water injection when drilling to control drilling dust. Standard <br />blasting practices using sequential delay timing schemes to generate effective rock fragmentation <br />and vibration control will also minimize blasting dust. Further, aggregate quarry operators will <br />invariably remove loose overburden to prevent dilution of mined rock, which lessens the amount <br />of fine material that can become airborne by blasting. If needed, during dry summer periods, <br />water can also be sprayed onto blast areas to further mitigate dust. If these standard practices are <br />applied, it is unlikely that airborne dust from blasting will be a cause of concern. <br />4.6 Impacts on Soll Resources <br />Some small amounts of blasting agents, which in quarries is typically ammonium nitrate pellets <br />mixed with fuel oil (ANFO), is lost to the ground by spillage or wind blowing while being <br />loaded. The amount on nitrates released to the ground by these losses is typically not tonic to any <br />flora or fauna in an and environment like that existing at the Cottonwood site. Wind-blown <br />ANFO dust that lands on the ground surface effectively becomes fertilizer for plants that convert <br />it to other natural matter through photosynthesis. If Linke Construction Co., consistent with <br />good practices for minimizing spillage, implements carefid clean-up procedures, concentrations <br />of nitrates or ammonia in soils will not be harmful or even noticeable. <br />REVEYAssociatm Inc. Page 17 April 2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.