My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-09-09_REVISION - M1987113 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1987113
>
2016-09-09_REVISION - M1987113 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:15:10 PM
Creation date
9/30/2016 4:33:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1987113
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/9/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Environment, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR3
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environment, Inc. Page 2 <br /> Bestway Concrete-Rocky Flats Pit M-1987-113 <br /> September 9,2016 <br /> The decision was made to operate the mine under the existing <br /> approved permit and at a later date to reapply for the ditch <br /> relocation if it is appropriate. Therefore the Technical Revision <br /> to move the ditches is withdrawn. <br /> 4. What offsets will be maintained between the limit of mining and the relocated ditches? <br /> The map has been revised to show the setback dimensions around the <br /> mine. The dig line in the original approval is approximately 30 <br /> to 50 feet for the center line of each respective ditch as <br /> described on page 6 of the 1987 application book. <br /> 5. The Reclamation Plan Map shows the pit walls will be reclaimed at 2H:1 V. The currently <br /> approved final grade of the pit walls is 31-11:IV. In Technical Revision No.1, the Operator <br /> acknowledged that it would be difficult to establish vegetation on a 21-1: IV slope and changed <br /> the final grade to 3H:1 V. The Division concurs that establishing vegetation on 21-11: IV slope is <br /> difficult. In addition, a 21-1: IV slope would not be commensurate with the approved post-mining <br /> land use of pastureland. The Technical Revision narrative does not discuss changing the final <br /> grade of the pit walls. Please revise the Reclamation Plan to depict the approved final grade of <br /> the pit walls. If the Operator wishes to change the final grade to 21-1:1 V, then provide a <br /> technical justification for this change and explain how vegetation will be successfully <br /> established on this slope. <br /> You are correct. The 2004 map was correct and the new slope left <br /> along the backfilled area on the south, is labeled and drawn at <br /> 3h:ly. <br /> 6. The Operator is proposing to mine deeper than what is currently approved, but does not <br /> specify the maximum depth in text. The Reclamation Plan Map shows the deepest part of the <br /> pit will be at an elevation of 6030'. Please confirm this is the maximum depth to which the pit <br /> will be mined. <br /> I can't state the final known floor elevation because we do not <br /> know how deep the reserve is on this site. The test holes the DOE <br /> did in the 1970 's were never drilled to the bottom of the Rocky <br /> Flats alluvium on this site so we are unsure how deep it goes. The. <br /> deepest monitoring well drilled by DOE, on the east side, was 100 <br /> feet and it did not reached bedrock. We also do not know if there <br /> is clay under the gravel as noted on page 7 of the original <br /> application book. It is drawn at the depth shown on the maps <br /> because some bottom elevation has to be shown, but we do not know <br /> how deep it will eventually be mined. The intent has always been <br /> to mine as deep as possible with the hopes that clay will be found <br /> under the alluvial deposit. It that is the case then the plan <br /> would be to chase the clay as deep as it is safe to do so or the <br /> bottom of the deposit is reached. So the maps show the minimum <br /> depth and we intend to maximize removal of the resource. <br /> 7. The Operator is proposing to mine the pit deeper. In Technical Revision No. 1, the Operator <br /> states the limiting factor to the depth of mining is groundwater which occurs at approximately <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.