Laserfiche WebLink
are compared with historic values to assess trends in water quality and flow and to <br /> evaluate whether potential impacts to surface water quality may be occurring. Data for <br /> a majority of surface water monitoring sites was provided as part of the Hydrology <br /> Evaluation, in Appendix 2 of the Amendment]] application (Volume II). Per our <br /> discussion on August 30, 2016, Newmont will submit surface water quality data to the <br /> division quarterly beginning with Q3 2016 data. Additionally, a summary of historic <br /> analytical data will be provided at a meeting tentatively scheduled in early November. <br /> 22. Figure 11-1, Water Monitoring Locations <br /> • The green text used to label the groundwater monitoring locations is nearly impossible <br /> to read. Please use a different color text and/or subdue the background to enhance <br /> readability. <br /> RESPONSE: A revised Figure 11-1 is included in Attachment 7. <br /> 23. Page 12-12, first Paragraph - Chicago Tunnel Portal Area/Underground Mining <br /> • The last sentence indicates the "Portal access will be secured". Please provide more <br /> details on portal closure and whether or not bat activity is/will be considered in the <br /> closure design. <br /> RESPONSE: Newmont has already identified the Chicago Portal as a future potential <br /> bat habitat once it is closed. We have had several conversations with representative of <br /> Colorado Parks and Wildlife who have provided information about what to lookfor in <br /> terms of signs of bats when opening historic workings and how to maximize habitat upon <br /> closure. <br /> 24. Page 12-13, fourth paragraph—VLF re-contour <br /> • The second sentence declares"Portions of the benches created during operations will be <br /> retained, as appropriate, for geotechnical and erosional stability." and Drawing F-1 is <br /> referenced for final topography. Drawing F-1 indicates slope lengths exceeding 2,000 <br /> feet are likely. Such long slopes will be highly susceptible to erosion gullying. The <br /> Division is unaware of any stormwater management designs for the VLF closures. As <br /> the end of life for the Arequa Gulch VLF is approaching, please commit to finalizing <br /> stormwater management designs for the VLFs in order to assure long-term stability. <br /> RESPONSE: Appendix H, Volume IV,p. 54 of 109, demonstrates Newmont is <br /> committed to ripping the slope along contour for approximately 617 acres of the Arequa <br /> Gulch VLF. In addition, Drawing CCVSA1I-3 indicates locations on Arequa Gulch <br /> where tree planting will occur thus also decreasing the chance of erosion. Newmont is <br /> committed to ensuring the long-term stability of the Arequa Gulch VLF. In addition, <br /> stormwater control structures located within Arequa Gulch will be maintained during <br /> reclamation. <br /> 25. Page 13-2, second paragraph—reclamation grading_ <br /> • The last sentence states"reclamation grading, slope reduction, and contouring <br /> oftentimes results in a facility encroaching outside its development footprint,resulting <br /> in a slightly larger affected area for reclamation". Please confirm reclamation grading <br /> will be confined to areas within the affected area boundary as defined in amended AM- <br /> II application. <br /> RESPONSE: Reclamation grading is designed such that graded materials will remain <br /> within the permit boundary. The discrepancy in this statement may have come from <br /> previous amendments where the disturbance boundary was a smaller footprint than the <br /> Page 11 of 30 <br />