My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_REVISION - M2004031
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2004031
>
_REVISION - M2004031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 10:58:16 AM
Creation date
9/28/2016 3:20:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004031
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Name
Rationalefor Recommendation to Approve Amendment with Objections
From
DRMS
To
Aggregate Industries
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rationale for Recommendation to Approve <br /> Page 15 <br /> September 26, 2016 <br /> groundwater levels in MW-3 and MW 11 B and within 0.54 feet of the pre-slurry wall average <br /> groundwater elevation in MW-2. <br /> In the TR to AM-01, submitted to the Division on September 1, 2016, the Operator committed to <br /> submitting to the Division within 60 days of completion of the permanent groundwater <br /> mitigation plan, a follow-up certification created by a qualified engineer certifying that the <br /> permanent plan was constructed in accordance with the plans, compaction requirements and <br /> specifications approved through AM-01. <br /> Therefore, the revised AM-01 demonstrates compliance with the requirements of Section 34- <br /> 32.5-116(4)(h) C.R.S., and Rule 3.1.6(1), whereby disturbances to the prevailing hydrologic <br /> balance must be minimized. <br /> 4. Concerns tltat additional US Army Corps of Engineers(USACOE) 404 permitting <br /> requirements are needed prior to approval ofAM-01 and implementation of the <br /> proposed corrective action. (Equity Funding LLC-second comment period) <br /> The Objector did not provide any documentation to support the assertion regarding jurisdictional <br /> wetlands being inadvertently created by the recent installation of the slurry wall. Regardless, the <br /> Operator is subject to USACOE permitting and reporting requirements for this operation, and is <br /> required to maintain compliance with the conditions of the existing 404 permit. As such, the <br /> Objector should direct such concerns to the USACOE. <br /> The Act and Rules do not require the attainment of all other permits prior to the approval of the <br /> Division's reclamation permit. Pursuant to Rules 1.4.9 and 1.4.13(1), the Office was mandated <br /> to render a recommendation on the application on September 26, 2016, and did so in accordance <br /> with the Act and Rules. <br /> S. Groundwater should be the focus of the amendment application (Equity Funding <br /> LLC—second comment period) <br /> The first three sentences of the TetraTech TR Memo dated August 24 2016, and also provided <br /> with the Equity Funding comment letter dated September 21, 2016 state: "This memorandum <br /> documents the design basis of the Orr water drain and the reservoir outlet at the Hazeltine Mine. <br /> This system will be constructed to address an Order from the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br /> Board. The pun pose of the drain is to mitigate elevated groundwater resultintg from the slur ny <br /> wall surrounding the Ha=eltine Mine on the Orr Property." (emphasis added) <br /> 6. Canntents regarding requirement for groundwater level monitoring outside of <br /> permit area utilizing additional new wells on Orr property with increased frequency <br /> and reporting requirements. (Equity Funding LLC—second comment period) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.