My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-09-21_REVISION - M2004031
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2004031
>
2016-09-21_REVISION - M2004031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:33:23 PM
Creation date
9/23/2016 10:33:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004031
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/21/2016
Doc Name Note
Comments on TR
From
Equity Funding LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Aggregate Industries (AI) submitted a Response to Second Adequacy Review and <br /> Technical Revision to Permit No. M-2004-031 (Amendment Application) to the Division of <br /> Reclamation and Mining Safety (Division) on September 1, 2016. Included in Al's Amendment <br /> Application is a Memorandum by Tetra Tech outlining the design basis of a project to drain <br /> water from property owned by Equity Funding, LLC (Orr Property) caused by the Hazeltine <br /> Mine. These comments are submitted on the proposal because: (1) the Al reclamation and <br /> remediation proposal must include application for a §404 permit to include the Orr Property; (2) <br /> the Al proposal must address the technical flaws identified; and (3) the Al proposal needs to put <br /> in place long-term monitoring to ensure any proposal works and the groundwater table is <br /> restored to pre-mining levels and is maintained. <br /> I. Aggregate Industries Must First Apply for an Amendment to 404 Permit <br /> The Tetra Tech Memorandum identifies "competing objectives" in the design of the <br /> project. On the one hand, the system is intended to drain the Orr Property (to restore it to its pre- <br /> mining condition) while at the same time preserving enough water in Bull Seep to "maintain pre- <br /> existing jurisdictional wetlands as well as compensatory wetlands as required by the US Army <br /> Corps of Engineers permit" on the land mined by Al. Tetra Tech admits in its report that "the <br /> amount of water necessary to maintain the wetlands and drain the Orr Property is not known at <br /> this time." <br /> There are, however, no competing objectives. US Army Corp of Engineer regulations <br /> define "wetlands" as "[t]hose areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at <br /> a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a <br /> prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands <br /> generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas." See U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br /> Information Pamphlet: Recognizing Wetlands, an Informational Pamphlet.l The relocation of <br /> the Bull Seep and the construction of the slurry wall as part of the mine operation have elevated <br /> the groundwater table. By 2011, about 73.27% of the Orr property had standing water on its <br /> surface and the groundwater table had risen by 11 feet. A site visit to the Orr Property on June <br /> 30, 2016 confirmed that these conditions have not lessened — standing water was present on at <br /> least two-thirds of the property and riparian/wetland vegetation covered nearly the entire parcel. <br /> By the plain definition used by the US Army Corps of Engineers, the Orr Property is a wetland <br /> due entirely to Al's mining activities on the adjacent parcel. <br /> Al currently operates under Department of the Army Permit No. 199980194 as amended <br /> on October 9, 2002. See Attachment 1, Al 404 Permit(Jan. 26, 2000); see also Attachment 2, Al <br /> 404 Permit Amendment No. 1 (Oct. 9, 2002). Neither the original permit, nor the subsequent <br /> amendment grant Al the authority to drain wetlands on the Orr Property. Al proposes to build <br /> structures that will affect the wetlands created on the Orr Property. 33 C.F.R. §322.1. The work <br /> involves installation of pipes and other infrastructure to divert water currently inundating the Orr <br /> Property to alter the wetland regime. 33 C.F.R. §§ 322.2(b), (c). The work would also involve <br /> the discharge of water to other wetlands. Thus, by draining the Orr Property, Al is actually <br /> operating outside the scope of its permit, and in order to implement any aspect of the design set <br /> forth in the memorandum by Tetra Tech, Al needs to request a permit amendment from the U.S. <br /> ' Available at:http://www.usace.army.mil/Portals/2/docs/civilworks/regulatory/rw_bro.pdf <br /> Page 1 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.