My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-09-13_INSPECTION - C2009087
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C2009087
>
2016-09-13_INSPECTION - C2009087
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2016 9:42:38 AM
Creation date
9/13/2016 9:07:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
9/13/2016
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Peabody Sage Creek Mining, LLC
Inspection Date
9/9/2016
Email Name
JLE
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 2 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br /> <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />Inspection Topic Summary <br />NOTE: Y=Inspected N=Not Inspected R=Comments Noted V=Violation Issued NA=Not Applicable <br />N - Air Resource Protection <br />N - Availability of Records <br />NA - Backfill & Grading <br />NA - Excess Spoil and Dev. Waste <br />N - Explosives <br />N - Fish & Wildlife <br />R - Hydrologic Balance <br />R - Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan <br />R - Other <br />NA - Processing Waste <br /> <br />N - Roads <br />NA - Reclamation Success <br />NA - Revegetation <br />NA - Subsidence <br />N - Slides and Other Damage <br />N - Support Facilities On-site <br />N - Signs and Markers <br />NA - Support Facilities Not On-site <br />NA - Special Categories Of Mining <br />R - Topsoil <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />This was a partial inspection of the Peabody Sage Creek Mine, operated by Peabody Sage Creek Mining, LLC. <br />(PSCM), DRMS permit No. C-2009-087. I, Jared Ebert of the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and <br />Safety (Division) conducted the inspection. Mr. Brian Watterson with PSCM accompanied me during the <br />inspection. The weather was clear and warm during the inspection. <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE - Rule 4.05 <br />Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, 4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7, 4.05.10; <br />Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Gr ound Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; <br />Drainage – Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; Impoundments 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br />Pond 004 was observed. PSCM has removed the original corrugated metal spillway pipe that was <br />decommissioned in 2005 that began to leak significantly earlier this summer. The culvert spillway was removed <br />and the embankment was re-established. According to Mr. Watterson, PSCM had hired an engineering firm to <br />conduct compaction tests as they reestablished the embankment. This firm is preparing a final report. The face of <br />the slope was measured to be 40% where the repair work was completed. Mr. Watterson indicated the contractor <br />had seeded the embankment but PSCM may re-seed the embankment repair area this fall. The top widt h of the <br />embankment was 14 feet where the repair work was completed. The embankment appears t o have been re- <br />established in accordance with the original as -built depicted on permit map 2.05.3-E2.C. The trash rack on the <br />approved primary spillway is damaged and needs to be repaired.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.