My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-08-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2016-08-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2018 10:11:29 AM
Creation date
9/12/2016 9:45:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/1/2016
Section_Exhibit Name
1.0 Introduction
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1.4 DETERMINATION OF BOND <br />Trapper Mining Inc. presently maintains a reclamation performance bond for the Trapper <br />Mine payable to the State of Colorado and the United States Office of Surface Mining <br />Reclamation and Enforcement. Upon approval of this permit application, a performance <br />bond or equivalent, acceptable surety will be secured in an amount equal to the estimated <br />costs for returning the affected area to a satisfactory condition as defined by applicable <br />regulations and this permit application. <br />The equipment productivity estimates used in regrade time calculations were derived from <br />the Caterpillar Performance Handbook, edition 38. Topsoil fleet hours were derived <br />using TALPAC haulage simulation software. DRMS database ownership and operating <br />costs were used where available; otherwise, these costs were extracted from Trapper <br />Mining Inc. historical data and information obtained from Wagner Equipment Rentals. <br />All reclamation costs were calculated according to the worst-case condition of reclamation <br />requirements. The costs that were calculated in this manner realistically represent those the <br />Division could incur at any time during the permit period, and not just for the conditions that <br />may exist at the end of the five years. Appendix A Tables A-1 through A-14 summarize <br />regrade, topsoil replacement, revegetation areas & costs, demolition, and miscellaneous <br />costs associated with mine closure. The driving factor in determining the worst case year <br />was the extent to which K -pit has been opened. This is both a truck/loader and dragline pit. <br />During the worst case year, which is estimated to be 2014, the depth and resulting volume <br />of material required to backfill K pit is at its maximum, with respect to the permit term. <br />Although the length of pit projected to be open is not as great as in 2013 (see Table 1.4-2), <br />the depth, area, and resulting volume is larger than what is anticipated for years 2013, and <br />2015 through 2017. By mid -year 2014, both the down dip cut and the last strikeline cut in K <br />pit are exposed. This occurs as the transition from the landslide strikeline pits to the down <br />dip cuts of L and M pits takes place. At the time of this transition, the resulting open cuts will <br />require approximately 2.8 million cubic yards of material to bring the final K pit to the <br />projected post mining topography. <br />AE (East Ashmore), and D (Derringer) pits remain unchanged for the permit term due mainly <br />to mining operations being concentrated in K, L, & M pits. The Ash Pit will continue to be <br />utilized for ash disposal, and G dip pit will be consumed in 2015 by L pit and substantially <br />reducing the total exposed open cut length As L pit, then M pits advance eastward, a <br />smaller area of remaining disturbance is realized as spoil grading is brought to concurrency <br />with the dragline operations, as has been the case historically at the Trapper Mine. A <br />summary of the estimated mine closure cost is presented in Table 1.4-1. Please refer to <br />Map M 6 for the post mining topography for the worst case bond year (2014) and to <br />subsequent tables and sections in Appendix A of the permit application as indicated in Table <br />1.4-1 for more detailed analysis and discussion. <br />The bond amount of $20,291,400 will be applied to our permit revision (PR7). This <br />represents the worst case cost for the period 2013-2017. Trapper estimates that during the <br />worst case year of 2014, the total disturbance within the approved permit area will be 1,968 <br />acres, which includes miscellaneous areas such as light use roads and silo locations. <br />The reduction in the bond amount is due mainly to the reclamation of F pit and the <br />decreasing areas of remaining disturbance as the mining operation approaches the existing <br />permit boundary. <br />1-31 <br />--i\ 10 13, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.