Laserfiche WebLink
6. The Applicant did not include any information for Exhibit G. Pursuant to Rule 1.10(1),the <br /> Applicant will not be required to submit any information which duplicates applicable previous <br /> submittals. However,the Applicant shall clearly describe where in the original application the <br /> information not included in the Amendment Application, but necessary to render the <br /> Amendment technically adequate, may be found. Please revise Exhibit G accordingly. <br /> Response: Exhibit G—The applicant has provided the water information just as it appeared in <br /> the originally approved application and is included in this resubmittal to be added to the <br /> amendment application. <br /> 7. The documentation included under Exhibit Q does not conform to the requirements of Rule <br /> 1.6.2(1)(a)(ii). Please provide proof that notice of the Amendment Application was sent to the <br /> local Board of County Commissioners and the Soil Conservation District. Proof of notice shall be <br /> in the form of a return receipt of a certified mailing or a date-stamped copy of the notice <br /> acknowledging receipt by the appropriate Board. <br /> Response: Exhibit Q—Proof of mailing notices to the Board of County Commissioners and Soil <br /> Conservation District has been provided by producing the"Certified Mail Receipt"for each. <br /> 8. The Applicant did not submit proof the Amendment Application was filed with the County Clerk <br /> and Recorder for public review. Proof of filing shall be an affidavit or receipt indicating the date <br /> on which the Amendment Application was placed with the County Clerk and Recorder for public <br /> review. <br /> Response: Exhibit R—Hand delivered the Amendment Permit to Lorimer County Clerk and <br /> Recorder for public review. They stamped and signed my transmittal for proof of the date it <br /> was submitted to them.See included stamped and signed transmittal. <br /> 9. The Applicant did not include any information for Exhibit S. Pursuant to Rule 1.10(1),the <br /> Applicant will not be required to submit any information which duplicates applicable previous <br /> submittals. However,the Applicant shall clearly describe where in the original application the <br /> information not included in the Amendment Application, but necessary to render the <br /> Amendment technically adequate, may be found. Please revise Exhibit S accordingly. <br /> Response: Exhibit S—The previous application did not address the man-made structure <br /> information required to satisfy Exhibit S. To satisfy Exhibit S with this submittal, we have listed <br /> all man-made structures within 200'of the mining operation. There are two structures that <br /> require structure agreements in place; <br /> a. County Road 27 along the east boundary of the quarry.A structure agreement has be <br /> hand delivered to the office of Mark Peterson, Lorimer County Engineer,for his <br /> signature,included with this submittal is the unsigned version of the structure <br /> agreement, will mail the signed copy as soon as we receive it. <br /> b. The overhead power lines and poles along the west side of County Road 27 are also <br /> within the 200'.A structure agreement has been sent to Poudre Valley REA Electric to <br /> be signed by John Bowerfind, we have included the unsigned version of this structure <br /> agreement and will mail the signed copy as soon as we receive it. <br />