My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-09-02_HYDROLOGY - M1992069
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1992069
>
2016-09-02_HYDROLOGY - M1992069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2020 12:10:25 PM
Creation date
9/7/2016 9:18:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992069
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
9/2/2016
Doc Name
Correspondence
From
City of Greeley
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Roger Schmidt <br /> September 2, 2016 <br /> Page 15 <br /> Street agricultural field would be expected to cause localized surficial erosion and <br /> possible deposition, but any erosion would not have resulted in the headcut and <br /> associated mass wasting of soil material that occurred in 2014. <br /> • Physical features that likely altered the flow in the Cache La Poudre River and may have <br /> introduced contributing factors to the amount of water flowing over the field during the <br /> - runoff event in June 2014 included the configuration of the Iverson/Martin Marietta <br /> gravel pit (located to the west, between the Cache La Poudre River and the concrete bike <br /> path) and the Great Western Railroad bridge that crosses the Cache La Poudre River <br /> (located to the north). During flood events, the backwater effect from the railroad bridge <br /> would be expected to cause more water to spill on to the F Street agricultural field than if <br /> the bridge was not present. However, the backwater condition caused by the railroad <br /> bridge existed for many years prior and did not result in a headcut across the field until <br /> the Al pit provided a mechanism for cascading flow into it. <br /> • Both the Al Pit and Iverson/Martin Marietta Pit are permitted gravel pit operations, <br /> approved by Weld County(documentation reviewed for Al Pit)and the State of Colorado <br /> Division of Reclamation and Mining Safety, or its predecessor agencies (documentation <br /> -- reviewed for Al Pit and Iverson/Martin Marietta Pit). Pit construction and reclamation <br /> requirements include measures to provide stabilized topography and to not adversely <br /> affect the stability of any significant, valuable, and permanent man-made structure(s) <br /> -' located within two hundred feet of the affected land. <br /> REFERENCES <br /> Documents reviewed for the preparation of this report include the following, organized by agency <br /> and date: <br /> Weld County Documents <br /> Aggregate Industries <br /> • Weld County Planning Commission Approval, Case 4USR-978 (August 4, 1992) <br /> • Approval of Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for an Open <br /> Pit Mining Operation, 83rd Joint Venture Resource (October 21, 1992) <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining& Safety Documents <br /> General Guidance <br /> • Title 34 Mineral Resources Article 32 Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act <br /> (1/29/2009) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.