My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-05-05_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2016-05-05_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2016 10:27:41 AM
Creation date
8/30/2016 1:06:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/5/2016
From
DRMS
To
JoEllen Turner SLash M LLC
Type & Sequence
SL18
Email Name
BFB
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Name of Addressee <br />Page 2 <br />April 5, 2016 <br /> <br />performance bond shall continue until the entire reclamation plan required under the Act, these Rules, and the <br />provisions of the permit have been completed, and until the permittee is released from any further liability <br />pursuant to 3.03.” <br /> <br /> <br />“It also states that these farms were going to be reclaimed and bond release given in a timely manner.” <br /> <br />The Division can enforce contemporaneous reclamation as outlined in Rule 4.13 and WFC has reclaimed the <br />land in a contemporaneous manner after mining operations. The land has also met the 10-year liability period <br />in many areas as required by Rule 3.02.3(2)(b). After the 10-year liability period, the Division does not have <br />any authority to tell the operator when to apply for bond release. That decision is made by WFC. <br /> <br /> <br />“These haul roads that are East of 27 road are not really disturbed areas even though the definition of a <br />disturbed area classifies it as such. Some of these roads did not even have the top soil removed and the road <br />was placed on the existing vegetation.” <br /> <br />The New Horizon permit (C-1981-008) describes how all haul roads will be constructed on page 2.05.3(3)-20. <br />It states that “all vegetation material and topsoil … will be removed from beneath the design roadbed…” The <br />definition of disturbance (Rule 1.04(36)) states in part “means an area where vegetation, topsoil, or overburden <br />is removed…” The operator did remove the topsoil before the haul road was constructed and stored it in a <br />stockpile. Rule 1.04(36) goes on to clarify that areas where topsoil has been removed is classified as disturbed. <br />By this definition and the requirement of the permit, the haul road is considered a disturbance. <br /> <br /> <br />“”OR”, so all the haul roads have been reclaimed and it does not say it has to follow rule 3, it says “OR.”” <br /> <br />Haul roads are not exempt from Rule 3. Rule 1.04(36) states “those areas are classified as disturbed until <br />reclamation is complete and the performance bond or other assurance of performance required by Rule 3 is <br />released.” This rule requires two actions by the operator: the first is reclamation must be completed. As you <br />noted, the haul roads have been completely reclaimed to pre-mine status. The second action is a performance <br />bond (or other assurance of performance) required by Rule 3 is released. A bond for the haul road has been <br />posted to the Division by WFC, but has not been released yet. The Division cannot release bond for a <br />disturbance until the requirements of Rule 3 have been achieved (Rule 3.02.1(4)). <br /> <br /> <br />“In all bond performance applications, permit applications, reclamation plan applications, revision <br />applications, and minor revisions, there is no mention that after phase three bond release on a farmers property <br />that he will have to wait an additional ten years plus to get his property back.” <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.