My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-08-29_REVISION - C1981035 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2016-08-29_REVISION - C1981035 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2016 8:27:43 AM
Creation date
8/30/2016 7:07:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/29/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #3
From
DRMS
To
GCC Energy, LLC
Type & Sequence
TR24
Email Name
RDZ
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
006 (Soils, <br />Vegetation and Land <br />Use) <br />007 (Operation Plan <br />& Surface Features) <br />For legibility would it be <br />possible to reduce the size and <br />boldness of Soils, vegetation <br />and Land Use fonts? Please <br />remove (as much as possible <br />without loss of clarity) from <br />each polygon the duplicate <br />labels of Soil Type, <br />Vegetation and Land Use. <br />Also, please increase the font <br />size in the legend of the soil <br />type, vegetation and landuse <br />text. <br />Please assure that text is not <br />obscured by symbology. <br />placed on top of it. Place <br />permit and affected area <br />boundaries under the soils <br />symbology (can you keep the <br />boundary text above the soil <br />type?). Can the three <br />vegetation types be <br />symbolized by a thick line <br />enclosing the polygons (a <br />color for each type) and <br />placed on top of all other line <br />work? Map has been revised <br />as requested. <br />Contour lines should be <br />placed below all other line <br />work. Text should not overlat <br />other text. Remove from the <br />legend: "Approximate Tree <br />Line" as there is no associated <br />symbology on the map. Also, <br />please call out symbology for <br />culverts in the legend. <br />Map has been revised as <br />uested. <br />For legibility would it be <br />possible to reduce the size <br />and boldness of Soils, <br />vegetation and Land Use <br />fonts? Please remove (as <br />much as possible without <br />loss of clarity) from each <br />polygon the duplicate labels <br />of Soil Type, Vegetation <br />and Land Use. Also, please <br />increase the font size in the <br />legend of the soil type, <br />vegetation and landuse text. <br />Please assure that text is not <br />obscured by symbology <br />placed on top of it. Place <br />permit and affected area <br />boundaries under the soils <br />symbology (can you keep <br />the boundary text above the <br />soil type?). Can the three <br />vegetation types be <br />symbolized by a thick line <br />enclosing the polygons (a <br />color for each type) and <br />placed on top of all other <br />line work? Map has been <br />revised as requested. <br />Feature names are called <br />out on the map, feature <br />symbols are also place on <br />the map. Please enclose <br />feature symbols in <br />parantheses and place after <br />the feature name. Also, <br />please enlarge the font on <br />the feature name key and if <br />ssi <br />on <br />555 Street Address, Room 555, Denver, CO 55555-5555 P 555.555.5555 <br />COQ° <br />A <br />* 1876 {` <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.