My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-08-18_ENFORCEMENT - P2011024
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Prospect
>
P2011024
>
2016-08-18_ENFORCEMENT - P2011024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2020 4:01:08 AM
Creation date
8/23/2016 8:51:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
P2011024
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
8/18/2016
From
DRMS
To
Seaglass Holding Corp.
Email Name
DMC
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.6(1). Prospector failed, by the anniversary date of the NOI, to submit an annual <br /> report, map, and fee for 2015, in violation of section 34-32-116(4), C.R.S. and Rules. <br /> 14. Under section 34-32-124(6)(a), C.R.S., if the Board finds that an <br /> operator violated a permit provision, the Board may suspend, modify, or revoke such <br /> permit. By violating provisions of the Act and Rules, Prospector is in violation of <br /> provisions of the NOI, specifically including provision V.6. Suspension, modification, <br /> or revocation of the NOI is appropriate. <br /> 15. The Board may find a financial warranty subject to forfeiture where a <br /> prospector failed to cure a default under a performance warranty despite written <br /> notice of the default and ample time to cure such default. C.R.S. § 34-32-118(1)(b) <br /> (2015). Prospector's violation of provisions of the Act and Rules constitutes <br /> Prospector's default under its performance warranty in provision V.6 of the NOI. <br /> Prospector defaulted on its performance warranty for the NOI, received written <br /> notice of the default, and failed to cure such default despite ample time to do so. <br /> ORDER <br /> Prospector did not appear in this matter to present any mitigating factors. <br /> There is no information before the Board indicating that any action other than the <br /> requested action is appropriate. Therefore, based on the foregoing findings of fact <br /> and conclusions of law, the Board enters the following order: <br /> The Board finds Seaglass Holding Corp. d/b/a US Rare Earths in continuing <br /> violation of the Act, under sections 34-32-116(4) and -127(2), C.R.S. and Rules for <br /> failing to submit required annual fees and annual reports and maps. <br /> The Board finds Seaglass Holding Corp. d/b/a US Rare Earths in violation of <br /> the Act pursuant to section 34-32-124(6)(a), C.R.S. <br /> The Board AFFIRMS the cease and desist order issued in the April 2016 Order. <br /> The Board orders that Notice of Intent number P-2011-024 is REVOKED. <br /> The Board finds the financial warranty- for Notice of Intent number P-2011- <br /> 024 to be subject to forfeiture under section 34-32-118(1)(b), C.R.S. for Prospector's <br /> failure to cure a default under its performance warranty. <br /> The Board directs the Division to, in accordance with section 34-32-118(2), <br /> C.R.S., notify Prospector that the financial warranty is subject to forfeiture and of <br /> its right to appear at a Board hearing to consider whether the financial warranty <br /> for the NOI should be forfeited, such hearing to be held at least thirty days after <br /> receipt of such notice. Prospector has not posted a financial warranty or identified <br /> Seaglass Holding Corp. d/b/a US Rare Earths <br /> P-2011-024/Powderhorn Project Exploration Drilling Program <br /> PV-2016-001 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.