Laserfiche WebLink
August 17, 2016 C-1981-013/Golden Eagle Mine RAR <br /> <br /> <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 1 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br /> <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br />INSPECTION: <br /> <br />SIGNS AND MARKERS Rule 4.02 <br />o Disturbed area boundary markers (white stakes) were intact and appeared properly placed. <br />o The mine site identification signs were intact, displaying all required information: mine <br />name, operator name, address, phone number and DRMS permit number and contact <br />information. <br /> <br /> <br /> Photo 1: Disturbed area boundary markers at the north <br />property boundary. <br /> <br /> Photo 2: Disturbed area boundary markers <br />at the south edge. <br /> <br />ROADS Rule 4.03 <br />Construction 4.03.1(3), 4.03.2(3); Drainage 4.03.1(4), 4.03.2(4); Surfacing and Maintenance <br />4.03.1(5) and (6) 4.03.2(5) and (6). <br />o The road into the facility appeared to be in good working order. <br />o No fugitive dust was being generated. <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE- Rule 4.05 <br />General Requirements 4.05.1; Effluent Standards 4.05.2; Divergence and Conveyance of Overland Flow 4.05.3; <br />Diversions 4.05.4; Sediment Control Measures 4.05.5, 4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7; Impoundments <br />4.05.9; Ground Water Monitoring4.05.13; Underground Mine Entry 4.05.10; Surface and Ground Water <br />Monitoring 4.05.13; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br /> <br />At the north edge of the permit boundary along the neighbors fence line, water is flowing on to the permit <br />boundary and causing onsite erosion impacts comprised of sediment deposition, rill and gullly formation. <br /> <br />DRMS highly recomends addressing this situation with the neighbor as soon as possible with the aim of <br />developing a mutually beneficial solution (possibly berming a section of the road) while the problem is <br />relatively small and more easily contained and mitigated.