My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-08-17_PERMIT FILE - M2016033
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2016033
>
2016-08-17_PERMIT FILE - M2016033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2020 3:45:16 AM
Creation date
8/18/2016 10:35:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2016033
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/17/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Holsinger Law, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 20 of 20 <br /> recreational, residential, & industrial sites, & to protect&promote the health, safety, & <br /> general welfare of the people of this state"—denying this app would be consistent with those <br /> goals & values <br /> (W.Dean,S.Mulliken) <br /> 150. App does not include explanation or description of if& how servient estate holder will <br /> compensate the dominant estate holders for impacts to LTC rd as result of change in use of <br /> servient estate, HRR, into a granite quarry operation <br /> (C.Bernstein) <br /> 151. It would be prudent to obtain a report from an independent& qualified biologist as to <br /> whether the proposed site is in fact special& should be preserved—we would be willing to <br /> provide more detailed info about the proposed land to be mined if you can provide us with <br /> lawful access to do so <br /> (S. Mulliken) <br /> 152. How will stability of rd be maintained throughout mining& reclamation phase & beyond <br /> [Rule 6.4.3(e)]especially if reclamation done with less absorbent vegetation? <br /> (C. Kimble) <br /> 153. It appears from DWR letter (dated April 21, 2016, Caleb Foy) that no water detention <br /> facilities are allowed in Fountain Creek watershed w/o a permit& must not cause material <br /> injury-Deadman Creek is in Fountain Creek watershed& there are 2 municipalities or <br /> quasi-municipalities relying on water from wells close to affected lands (Red Rock Valley <br /> Water& City of Fountain) - was City of Fountain contacted that it might experience de- <br /> watering or contamination w/wells? <br /> (C.Kimble) <br /> C4 OF CO \ <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 P 303.866.3567 F 303.832.8106 http://mining.state.co.us <br /> John W. Hickentooper, Governor Robert W. Randall, Executive Director I Virginia Brannon, Director I i* '�O <br /> t876 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.