My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-08-17_PERMIT FILE - M2016033
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2016033
>
2016-08-17_PERMIT FILE - M2016033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2020 3:45:16 AM
Creation date
8/18/2016 10:35:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2016033
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/17/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Holsinger Law, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 11 of 20 <br /> 62. Exhibit E-for Gambel Oak/Mountain Mahogany reclamation areas- Gambel Oak can be <br /> extreme fire hazard-many locals currently removing or reducing these-can other plants be <br /> selected for fire resistance? <br /> (N.Reed) <br /> 63. Exhibit E-since phased reclamation, how often will topsoil&fines stockpiles be reseeded? <br /> (N. Reed) <br /> 64. Exhibit E- what other chemicals besides mycorrhizal solution or inoculant for bare root <br /> seedlings will be used for reclamation? <br /> (N.Reed) <br /> 65. Exhibit G-how calculate max flow cap of 20.11 cfs for LTC? Only 3 data pts collected over <br /> 3 month period sufficient for analyses?Max flow in recent floods far exceed 20.11 cfs-May <br /> 2015 floods overwhelmed culverts which have capacity of 70 cfs <br /> (N.Reed) <br /> 66. Exhibit G-given only 3 data points collected @ station LTC-], how can say similar to <br /> historic flows @ USGS station 7099220?No data sources available for significant flood <br /> years 1921, 1935, 1965, 1995, 1997, 2013, 2015?Are proposed water management structures <br /> undersized? <br /> (N.Reed) <br /> 67. Exhibit G- what 24-hr rain amount was used for maximum storm estimate? What damage <br /> expected to LTC rd or property below quarry if water management structures fail during <br /> flood event? Will operator compensate owners for damage due to improperly sized capacity <br /> of water management structures to deal with flood events? <br /> (N.Reed) <br /> 68. Exhibit G- Table G-2 shows 24-hr storm event data based on NOAA calculations—is this <br /> data based on rain figures for CO Springs airport?If so, why no adjustments made to <br /> account for higher rain rates in LTC canyon compared to airport? <br /> (N.Reed, C. Kimble) <br /> 69. Exhibit G-states "sediment levels should be examined annually following highest runoff <br /> season & sediment removal should be undertaken in fall to prepare sediment pond for next <br /> rainy season"- will operator commit to this plan instead of"should be"? <br /> (N.Reed) <br /> 70. Exhibit G-says no acid-forming or toxic materials identified during drilling& sampling- <br /> but sampled very small portion of site- will there be ongoing testing? What is the plan if <br /> these materials are identified during operation? <br /> (N. Reed) <br /> %F c0� <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 P 303.866.3567 F 303.832.8106 http://mining.state.co.us <br /> John W. Hickenlaoper, Governor I Robert W. Randall, Executive Director I Virginia Brannon, Director I ;* n G 1 0 <br /> \�1876 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.