Laserfiche WebLink
Hart Environmental <br /> August 17, 2016 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> Please provide evidence(certified letter to structure owners)that a notarized agreement between the structure <br /> owners and the applicant was pursued. If an agreement is unable to be reached a geotechnical assessment <br /> may be provided to demonstrate that the structures shall not be damaged. <br /> You must provide information sufficient to demonstrate that the stability of any structures located within two <br /> hundred(200)feet of the operation or affected land will not be adversely affected. <br /> Please review all information required for 6.2.4 sections (b) and (g) for completeness and accuracy and <br /> confirm that this information is consistent with information in Exhibit S. DRMS will need proof of delivery <br /> of structure agreements to owners of all structures listed in the application within 200 feet of the permit. <br /> In the event that structure agreements cannot be executed between permittee and structure owner,DRMS will <br /> accept the previously provided recommended setback of 100' between mining excavation and the nearest <br /> structure—provided that the maximum depth of excavation does not exceed 33 feet, and that mining slopes <br /> are no steeper than 3:1 horizontal to vertical. <br /> If the depth of excavation increases beyond 33 feet,the setback will also need to be increased to maintain a <br /> minimum setback of a horizontal distance equal to three times the depth of excavation with mining slopes no <br /> steeper than 3:1 horizontal to vertical. If these conditions cannot be met, another geotechnical stability <br /> assessment must be submitted to demonstrate that the proposed change will not adversely impact adjacent <br /> structures. <br /> Additional Information: You will also need to provide the Division with proof of notice publication and <br /> notice to all property owners within 200 feet of the affected area. Any letters from other commenting <br /> agencies/entities received by the Division to date have been included with this correspondence for you to <br /> review. <br /> This concludes the Division's preliminary adequacy review of this application. This letter shall not be <br /> construed to mean that there are no other technical deficiencies in your application. Other issues may arise as <br /> additional information is supplied. Please remember that the decision date for this amendment application is <br /> October 17, 2016. As previously mentioned, if you are unable to provide satisfactory responses to any <br /> inadequacies prior to this date, it will be your responsibility to request an extension of time to allow for <br /> continued review of this application. If there are still unresolved issues when the decision date arrives and no <br /> extension has been requested,the application will be denied. If you have any questions,please contact me at <br /> (303) 866-3567 x8140. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Eric Scott—Environmental Protection Specialist <br /> Enclosures: SEO comment <br />