My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-08-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1981185 (2)
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2016-08-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1981185 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:25:42 PM
Creation date
8/15/2016 8:36:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/10/2016
Doc Name
EPA Enforcement
From
Operator
To
DRMS
Email Name
DMC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the Order pursuant to CWA Section 309(b), 33 U.S.C. § 1319(b). <br />D. In the Complaint, the United States seeks civil penalties against the Defendants, <br />pursuant to CWA Section 309, 33 U.S.C. § 1319, for alleged violation of Section 301(a) of the <br />Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1311(a), by discharging dredged and fill material into waters of <br />the United States without appropriate permits under CWA Section 404, 33 U.S.C. § 1344. The <br />United States also seeks injunctive relief against the Defendants in the form of a court order <br />requiring them not to violate the CWA, and an injunction requiring them to restore the Site. <br />E. The United States and Defendants agree that settlement of this case is in the public <br />interest and that entry of this Consent Decree is the most appropriate means of resolving the <br />United States' claims under the CWA against Defendants in this case. <br />F. The Court finds that this Consent Decree is a reasonable and fair settlement of the <br />TJnited States' claims against Defendants in this case, and that this Consent Decree adequately <br />protects the public interest in accordance with the CWA and all other applicable federal law. <br />THEREFORE, in lieu of taking of any testimony upon the pleadings, without further <br />adjudication. of any issue of fact or law, and upon consent of the parties hereto by their <br />authorized representatives, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: <br />II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE <br />1. Court's Jurisdiction. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action <br />and over the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345, and 1355, and Section 309(b) of the <br />CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 1319(b). <br />2. Venue. Venue is proper in the District of Colorado pursuant to CWA Section 309(b), <br />33 U.S.C, § 1319(b), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c), and 1395(a), because the Defendants <br />—3— <br />Case 1:16-cv-02008-WYD Document 2 Filed 08/08/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 82
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.