My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-08-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1981185 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2016-08-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1981185 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:25:42 PM
Creation date
8/15/2016 8:36:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/10/2016
Doc Name
EPA Enforcement
From
Operator
To
DRMS
Email Name
DMC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Final -Restoration and Compliance Plan for May Day Idaho Mine Complex <br />Administrative Order for Compliance, Docket No. CWA-08-2012-0011 <br />The Mitigation Monitoring Report will be prepared by a wetland scientist and will meet the <br />minimum standards described in Regulatory Guidance Letter 08-03 (EGL 08-03). The first <br />report will be provided by December 1, 2016 and subsequent reports will be provided by <br />December 1st of each year that monitoring is required. The Mitigation Rule and RGL 08-03 <br />require compensatory mitigation areas to be monitored for a minimum of five full years following <br />completion of the mitigation areas. USEPA may consider a written request to reduce the five <br />year monitoring requirement following submittal of at least two consecutive annual monitoring <br />reports which demonstrate that all final performance standards have been met, including <br />verification through a USEPA/Corps inspection. <br />8.0 CONTINGENCY MEASURES <br />Deficiencies with the mitigation work could include: <br />• Lack of germination of seeded areas. <br />• Mortality of planted species. <br />• Invasion by noxious weeds. <br />• Predation by wildlife. <br />• Excessive erosion. <br />• Death of planted trees. <br />Potential measures to rectify deficiencies will depend on the specifics, but could include: <br />• Re-seeding. <br />• Re-planting of wetland species. <br />• Re-mulching and implementation of additional erosion control measures. <br />• Application of approved herbicides (in strict accordance with the label instructions). <br />• Re-planting of riparian trees. <br />• Fencing to limit access by wildlife. <br />June 2016 Bikis Water Consultants, a division of SGM Page 17 <br />Case 1:16-cv-02008-WYD Document 2 Filed 08/08/16 USDC Colorado Page 47 of 82
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.