Laserfiche WebLink
✓08/04/2016 THU 12:57 PAX 7192813296 AIM HONE HEALTH 1@001/002 <br />AUG 0 4 2016 <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION Jason and Tina Potestio <br />MINING AND SAFETY 41305 Olson Rd <br />Avondale, CO 81022 <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />soo9 <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 C .'=sRecaWed <br />ohjee!!on lane* <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />To Whom It May Concern, <br />The rural community is not in support of the proposed Pueblo County Aggregate Project. The <br />main reason we are not in support of this is because of Its environmental impact. We are a farming and <br />ranching community and rely on our environment for our livelihoods. In a case study done in New <br />Mexico In 2004 it was shown that the primary impacts of aggregate, stone, and industrial mines are <br />degraded air quality, disturbed areas on the mine and groundwater usage. Surface and groundwater <br />impacts related to mining have a large Impact on our farming and ranching operations. There is often a <br />large amount of sediment left in the water around these stone and aggregate mines. This causes <br />significant degradation to the water supplies. We rely on both irrigation from ditch water shares, rain <br />and groundwater for our crops to flourish_ Our livestock rely on the ponds, streams, and aquaducts for <br />their drinking water. Poor water quality leads to poor crops, poor health in our livestock, which in turn <br />affects our way of living. Other impacts on the environment are increased traffic on new or existing <br />roads. Heavy materials being hauled in and out at a very constant rate causes breakdown on these <br />roadways. This also causes aesthetic degradation caused by both active and abandoned mines. This has <br />a trickle-down effect of lowering the real estate value of our properties. Let's face it people move to the <br />country to see the country, not to see a Hole in the ground that has been stripped of its minerals and <br />forestation. Very few of these mines become reclaimed or re -vegetated after they have been used up <br />and abandoned. It is often the promise to the people In these areas that the gravel pits will be reclaimed <br />and that is meant to put our minds at ease, however, if you take a drive across any rural community in <br />the US that has had a mining operation you can see that this is rarely the case. Natural re -forestation <br />may occur in some of these places once the groundwater has had time to return to quality enough to <br />grow vegetation again, but this does nothing to fill in the large open areas remaining of the pits. Air <br />quality is another issue with these operations. It Is often regulated that the air quality only be tested <br />once every 7 days, which would mean that the air quality at any given mine is only tested 14% of the <br />time it is operating. Mines can often choose what days they want to do this testing, which means they <br />can avoid windy days and can test on calm days when the quality will rate Nigher due to the particulates <br />settling to the ground. <br />To summarize the many reasons we are not in support, I have put together a list of the negative <br />impacts related to aggregate mining. <br />• increased dust/diesel fumes on the haul road in and out of the mine <br />• Dust from non-compliant crushing operations <br />• Dust and sediment from the piles of gravel and sand at the site <br />