My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-07-28_REVISION - M2016010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2016010
>
2016-07-28_REVISION - M2016010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2020 10:58:31 PM
Creation date
8/1/2016 11:47:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2016010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/28/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #3
From
Transit Mix Concrete Co.
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.t <br /> Transit Mix Concrete Co. <br /> not included in the reclamation plan are required for successful revegetation, appropriate <br /> revisions to the plan will be submitted to CDRMS for review and approval.The revegetation plan <br /> has been modified significantly since the original submission to address public and agency <br /> concerns and to assure compliance with rules which is provided below.This revised revegetation <br /> plan takes into account changes in slope, aspect and elevation. Therefore, to increase <br /> reclamation and revegetation success post mining, the proportions of the various species would <br /> best be varied based on these three parameters. Proposed proportions of species are based upon <br /> vegetation sampling conducted onsite by BIO-Logic during preparation of the Mexican Spotted <br /> Owl Habitat Assessment and Exhibit J. <br /> Mixed Conifer <br /> A mixed conifer forest will be replanted within the majority of the quarry area reestablishing a <br /> Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)/Ponderosa pine (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forest. Areas south <br /> of Little Turkey Creek will have a preponderance of Douglas fir compared to Ponderosa pine, and <br /> to the north of Little Turkey Creek it will have a preponderance of Ponderosa pine compared to <br /> Douglas fir. Douglas fir is more suited to generally cooler and moister north-facing slopes, <br /> whereas Ponderosa pine is more tolerant of the hot, dry conditions on south-facing slopes. On <br /> both sides of the creek in areas where the steep walls will contour in and provide protected areas <br /> and variability in aspect and microclimate, a preponderance of Douglas fir will be planted. On the <br /> pit bottom, it is probable that Ponderosa pine with some understory shrubs such as Gambel oak <br /> (Quercus gambelii) and three-leaf sumac (Rhus trilobota) will improve reclamation success. <br /> Mixed conifer will be planted at 43 stems/acre in the following areas using the provided rates <br /> and proportions: <br /> • Slopes to the south of Little Turkey Creek will be planted with a preponderance of Douglas fir <br /> at 85% and Ponderosa pine at 15%. <br /> • The pit bottoms both south and north of Little Turkey Creek will be planted with a <br /> preponderance of Ponderosa pine at 70%, Douglas fir at 20%, with additional understory <br /> shrubs such as Gambel oak at 5% and three-leaf sumac at 5%. <br /> Mountain Shrubland <br /> As shown in Exhibit J of the July 14, 2016 permit submittal, existing vegetation communities in <br /> the quarry site vary. In particular, the south-facing slopes to the north of Little Turkey Creek and <br /> Deadman Gulch support extensive pinyon-juniper woodland and mountain shrubland, with the <br /> two communities intergrading. Mixed conifer forest to the north of Little Turkey Creek is confined <br /> to draws. Reclamation is likely to be more successful on the south-facing slopes if a mixed <br /> mountain shrubland and pinyon-juniper community is targeted. Gambel oak/mountain <br /> Hitch Rack Ranch Quarry Permit Application M-2016-010 <br /> Responses to Objection Letters <br /> July 28, 2016 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.