My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-03-17_REVISION - M1985001
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1985001
>
2016-03-17_REVISION - M1985001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 11:44:34 AM
Creation date
7/12/2016 11:00:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985001
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/17/2016
From
Wasteline, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SI2
Email Name
LJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page i of 3 <br /> Jim Helmericks <br /> From: "Debby& Nathan Barton,WASTELINE. Inc." <SDLibert_y@aol.com> <br /> Date: Monday, March 14, 2016�'._44 AM <br /> To: "Jim"<durangogravel@frontier.net> RECEIVED <br /> Subject: Letter in body of message <br /> Dear Mr. Waldron : MAR 17 2016 <br /> DIVISION OF RECLAMATION <br /> MINING AND SAFETY <br /> Subject: Request for Increase in Financial <br /> Warranty and Reclamation Cost Estimate <br /> I received a copy via e-mail of the new <br /> calculation of reclamation costs for M1985-001, <br /> the 3 & ] Pit, in La Plata County, together with a <br /> request to provide the increased financial <br /> warranty, sent to me by Mr, Lucas West. This <br /> letter is my formal request to discuss the <br /> increased estimate, which is significant, and to <br /> state my intent to provide additional information <br /> which should significantly reduce the amount <br /> requested . <br /> I do wish to point out a number of concerns <br /> which impact on this review and discussion. <br /> The permit as approved by the MLRB was for a <br /> I : I or 1/2: 1 reclamation slope, as stated in the <br /> original application. Those slopes, though <br /> steeper than normal practice, do match the <br /> existing undisturbed slopes in the vicinity, were <br /> demonstrated to be stable, and are a part of the <br /> planned post-mining use as industrial, by <br /> maximizing the space available on the property <br /> for that use. I believe that Mr. West <br /> misunderstood the information in the file, and <br /> that further discussion can clarify this matter. <br /> 3/14/2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.