Laserfiche WebLink
Tabetha Lynch <br />Page 3 <br />July 11, 2016 <br />reclaimed site. Alfalfa and Cicer Milkvetch (Astragalus cicer) were the most commonly <br />encountered perennial forbs. The 2015 report indicated the total allowable cover averaged <br />82.48% and perennial plant cover averaged 59.35%. For the 2015 data, perennial grasses <br />Intermediate Wheatgrass, Great Basin Wildrye, Kentucky Bluegrass, Western Wheatgrass, and <br />Sheep Fescue dominated the seeded vegetation on the reclaimed site. Alfalfa was the most <br />commonly encountered perennial forb. <br />The revegetation monitoring reports data allowed cover from Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) to <br />contribute to the allowable cover percentage for some of the transects this species was found in. <br />Cheatgrass is listed as a List C noxious weed. The Division is unable to allow plant species <br />listed on the State Noxious Weed list (Department of Agriculture, Conservation Services <br />Division, 8 CCR 1206-2: Rules Pertaining to the Administration and Enforcement of the <br />Colorado Noxious Weed Act') to contribute to reclamation success. The Division Guidelines; <br />Guideline Regarding Selected Coal Mine Bond Release issues, April 18, 1995, specifically state <br />that, "under no condition will noxious weeds count towards the success standard." Based on the <br />revegetation monitoring report data, cheatgrass had contributed a small amount to the relative <br />cover for the site and an insignificant amount to the allowable cover percentage. The Division <br />reviewed and modified the data submitted in the 2014 and 2015 revegetation monitoring report <br />to remove the contribution of Cheatgrass to the allowable cover percentage. The differences <br />between what the Division determined to count toward allowable cover and TMI's was <br />insignificant and did not preclude the Division from finding that the reclaimed sites met the <br />required vegetation cover success standards. <br />The range site A reclamation success standard for cover is 52% (effective/allowable cover). <br />Based on a direct comparison, the average percent allowable cover for both 2014 and 2015 <br />exceeded the success standard for range site A. Revegetation on the requested reclamation range <br />site A/B blocks was sampled to statistical adequacy for vegetative cover for both years of <br />sampling, 2014 and 2015. <br />The revegetation productivity success standard is 62.39 grams per square meter or 15.60 g/1/4 <br />m2 for the range site A/B reclamation block. As recommended in the Division's guidelines; <br />annuals, biennials and shrub production were not included in the production success <br />measurements. In 2014, the forage production on the site averaged 72.93 g/1/4 m2 or 291.72 <br />g/m2 according to the revegetation monitoring report. In 2015, forage production averaged <br />86.07 g/1/4 m2 or 344.29 g/m2. Since the reclaimed area production value exceeds the <br />revegetation success standards, as allowed in the Division's existing regulations (Rule <br />4.15.11(2)), and applying the reverse null statistical approach, it can be concluded that the <br />requested reclaimed range site AB block satisfies the requirements with respect to production. <br />