My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-07-08_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2016010
>
2016-07-08_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2016 2:40:53 PM
Creation date
7/8/2016 11:47:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2016010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/8/2016
Doc Name
Letter of Objection
From
Nancy Reed
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
operator would have to remove the blockage and/or repair the damage during the period that this lengthy <br />investigation and enforcement process is underway. During an extended period of time, our road might <br />be obstructed or unsafe to use. <br />I understand from reviewing mining law that Transit Mix will be required to get structure agreements <br />from the owners of the easement for the portion of the road and the culverts that lie within 200 feet of the <br />affected lands. In the future, Transit Mix would be required to compensate us for damage to the road if <br />we can prove that their operations caused the damage. However, being forced to prove that the operator <br />is responsible for the damage will place a huge financial burden on the easement owners for legal <br />expenses and, possibly, technical experts. Furthermore, a portion of the easement road within Section 16 <br />downstream of the quarry is outside of that 200 foot area and would not be covered by those structure <br />agreements. That portion of the road is particularly vulnerable to flood damage because the canyon <br />narrows dramatically below the proposed quarry operations area and some portions of the road run just a <br />few feet above the creek bed. <br />Since my previous objection letters, I have also talked with the civil engineer who designed the culverts <br />that the easement owners installed in the four stream crossings within Section 16. I understand from that <br />conversation that the vegetation cover within the quarry operations area will be permanently altered by <br />the quarry operations and subsequent reclamation. During the period that the quarry pits have bare rock <br />exposed, the amount of run-off from storms will be significantly increased. Water management structures <br />may somewhat mitigate the run-off, but MAY also fail if they are inadequately designed. Furthermore, <br />those water management structures will be removed during reclamation. Vegetation proposed for <br />reclamation will be less absorbent than current vegetation, as suggested by the vegetation curve numbers <br />that Transit Mix used for its design of the water management structures. As a result, the expected amount <br />of Flood run-off will be increased within the quarry operations area even after the area is reclaimed, which <br />will therefore increase the risk of blockage or damage to our easement road FOREVER. <br />Transit Mir may agree to assume responsibility for repairing damage to the road and culverts during the <br />life of the quarry. However, Transit Mix is only leasing the land and will therefore be out of the picture <br />after the quarry closes. At that point, who will assume responsibility for repairing flood damage to the <br />road caused by the permanent alteration of the quarry area? The land owner? The easement owners have <br />had an ongoing battle with the owners of Hitch Rack Ranch for the past forty years as we have attempted <br />to maintain and improve our easement road. Blockage and maintenance of the easement road could <br />become an absolute nightmare for the easement owners, not just during the proposed 55 year life of the <br />mine, but FOREVER. <br />Granting the application would clearly violate the express language in the 1968 court decree and long <br />standing Colorado easement law. If the application is approved, we and other property owners within the <br />Eagles Nest subdivision will almost certainly proceed with legal action <br />Sincerely, <br />kw '�) 6 <br />Nancy Reed <br />4848 Little Turkey Creek Road <br />Colorado Springs, CO 80926 <br />Phone: 719-445-2030 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.