My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-06-16_INSPECTION - M1977573
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1977573
>
2016-06-16_INSPECTION - M1977573
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:23:39 PM
Creation date
6/20/2016 12:52:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977573
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
6/16/2016
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Continental Materials Corporation
Email Name
TOD
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERMIT #: M-1977-573 <br />INSPECTOR’S INITIALS: TOD <br />INSPECTION DATE: March 14, 2016 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br /> <br />This normal routine monitoring inspection was conducted by Tyler O’Donnell of the Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining and Safety (Division). Continental Materials Corporation (Operator), was represented by Andre Laroche <br />and Bill Pope during the inspection. <br /> <br />The Pueblo West Pit is located in Pueblo County just west of Pueblo, Colorado. The Pueblo West Pit is a 127.75- <br />acre 112c Construction Materials Reclamation Permit. The primary commodity that was mined at the site was <br />sand and gravel. The 112c Construction Materials Reclamation Permit was issued in March of 1978. The site <br />has had several changes made to the permit to increase the permitted area and then later to reduce the permitted <br />area. The permit area has been reduced to the clay lined reservoir and the immediate surrounding lands. The <br />approved post-mining land use is developed water resource. The mine site was surrounded by the following land <br />uses: Residential, Wildlife habitat and rangeland. <br /> <br />No problems or possible violations were observed during the inspection. During the inspection, the sky was clear <br />and the ground was dry. The current Financial Warranty is adequate to complete the remaining reclamation <br />liability. The Site was not active during the inspection. It appears that the mining related disturbance has been <br />partially reclaimed. All former pit slopes have been graded to 3H:1V or flatter, no highwalls were observed. All <br />slopes appeared stable, no significant erosion was observed during the inspection. There were two stockpiles of <br />either topsoil or crusher fines in the bottom of the pit. It appears that topsoil has been spread around the entire <br />affected land above the proposed full pool of the reservoir. It appears that all of the affected lands, above the <br />proposed full pool of the reservoir had been revegetated. Desired vegetation has not begun to establish well on <br />any of the affected lands that were previously seeded. Vegetative cover primarily consisted of annual weeds and <br />a few native volunteer species. There were a few Russian olive trees and a few tamarisk trees scattered around <br />the site. The operator will need to treat and eradicate all noxious weeds. There was a small basin in the <br />southeastern corner of the former pit that collects the seep water. The compacted clay liner passed the State <br />Engineer’s Leak Test and was approved on September 1, 2006. The seep water collected in the basin is pumped <br />out and discharged weekly to biweekly. To date no water has been stored in the reservoir. <br /> <br />CONCLUSION <br /> <br />The Site is mined out, the Operator is in the process of conducting final reclamation. The approved reclamation <br />plan allowed for three different reclamation options (enclosed). The Division has summarized the three options: <br />1) Pass the leak test and use the site as a water storage reservoir, 2) pass the leak test, spread topsoil and revegetate <br />the entire pit, and 3) fail leak test and reclaim the site as an exposed groundwater pond. Since the liner has passed <br />the leak test only options 1 and 2 are available. The Operator’s representatives stated that they have had difficulty <br />getting a client to store water in the reservoir or someone to sell the reservoir to. Based on conversations the <br />Division had with the Operator’s representatives it appears that the Operator may reclaim the site using option 2. <br /> <br />Inspection Contact Address <br />Andre Laroche <br />Continental Materials Corporation <br />444 E. Costilla <br />Colorado Springs, CO 80903 <br /> <br />Enclosure: Portion of the Approved Reclamation Plan (AM-04) <br /> <br />cc: Wally Erickson, DRMS
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.