My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-06-08_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2016-06-08_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:23:17 PM
Creation date
6/20/2016 9:04:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/8/2016
Doc Name
Pages 2.05-65 to 2.05-197.3 part 2
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Soil Stabilization Plan <br />•Proper site preparation and soil handling strategies will be utilized to control wind and water erosion. The <br />movement and manipulation of topsoil materials in a moist condition minimizes wind and water erosion. As <br />explained by Bauer et al. (1976), a protective surface seal develops as silt and clay fractions bond together after <br />reapplication of topsoil. This phenomenon is attributable to the rapid evaporation of surface moisture from <br />redistributed soil materials. <br />Disturbed areas will be subjected to final grading, but will remain in a rough condition to assist stability and resist <br />slippage of topsoil after reapplication. Leaving the graded surface in a roughened configuration also improves <br />moisture permeability between the spoil/topsoil interface (Bauer et at. 1976). Scrapers will reapply topsoil along <br />the contour whenever possible. The tracks made by scrapers create a "terracing" effect that helps to reduce <br />overland surface flow and the potential loss of topsoil. Following topsoil reapplication, but before seeding, the <br />topsoil will be graded to insure a uniform and stable thickness which will be consistent with the reclamation and <br />revegetation requirements. <br />Prior to seeding, which will be initiated as soon as practical after final grading, topsoiled sites will be chisel -plowed <br />in order to alleviate compaction and promote water infiltration. Chisel -plowing has been a highly effective means <br />of temporary stabilization prior to vegetation establishment. Dollhopf et al. (1977) reported that chisel -plowed <br />topsoil at the Savage, Beulah and Colstrip Surface Mines were only surpassed by the radical treatment of dozer <br />basins in reducing overland water flow from reclaimed mine sites. The water detention capacity of chisel -plowed <br />topsoil is reported by Dollhopf et al. (1977) as 176,400 liters per hectare, or 2,521.3 cubic feet per acre. <br />Another stabilization technique which serves to minimize erosion is contour furrowing. Disturbed land within the <br />proposed permit area will be contour furrowed following seeding. A typical cross section of a contour furrow is <br />depicted in Figure 12, Design of Typical Contour Furrow. According to data derived from studies at the Energy <br />•Mine No. 1, the water detention capacity of these furrows, when spaced thirty feet apart, is 2,599.7 cubic feet per <br />acre. <br />A brief evaluation of the total projected impact from a 10 -year, 24-hour rainfall event is illustrative of the <br />effectiveness of chisel plowing and contour furrowing techniques. The projected precipitation from a 10 -year, 24- <br />hour rainfall event is 1.8 inches, or 6,534 cubic feet per acre. The water detention capacity of reclaimed sites <br />prepared with both chisel -plowing and contour furrowing techniques amounts to 5,121 cubic feet per acre, or 78% <br />(1.41 inches) of the projected 10 -year, 24-hour rainfall event. Therefore, the total amount of water capable of <br />becoming surface runoff from a rainfall event of this magnitude is only .39 inches. <br />Research recently conducted at Energy Mine No. 1 and at the Edna Mine demonstrates that a reasonable estimate <br />for infiltration of water on reclaimed land is 85% of detention capacity (McWhorter 1979; John Gilley, USDA -SEA <br />unpublished data). Hence, the infiltration potential of reclaimed lands within the proposed permit area is 1.19 <br />inches or approximately three times greater than total potential surface water runoff (.39 inches) from a 10 -year, 24- <br />hour rainfall event. Consequently, the detention capacity and infiltration potential of reclaimed lands taken <br />together, will allow all rainfall to be potentially available for plant growth, and will minimize runoff from reclaimed <br />lands. <br />The aforementioned surface treatments are designed to reduce overland flow of water and shall be supplemented by <br />techniques suggested by Clyde, et al., (1978) if the need arises. The techniques recommended by these <br />researchers include the use of barriers, check dams, erosion stops, matting and roughened surfaces. These <br />treatments can be implemented with various kinds of straw bales, nettings and mattings to effectively reduce <br />overland flow. If results of the annual rill and gully survey indicate excessive erosion has occurred, Twentymile <br />Coal Company will initiate remedial measures. Gullies may be blocked with one of the above-mentioned <br />treatments to provide the opportunity for natural stabilization through the growth of vegetation. Corrective actions, <br />where needed, will be completed by October 31 of the year following the survey. <br />RN08-05 2.05-107 03/12/10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.