Laserfiche WebLink
therefore: Qr = (0.17 ft/day)(0.5 ft)(I,500 ft2) <br />Q1 127.5 cubic ft/day for outcrop area one, and <br />Q2 (0.17 ft/day)(0.5 ft)(22,440 fl?) <br />Q2 = 1,907.4 cubic ft/day for outcrop area two <br />The combined total recharge for both outcrops using a hydraulic conductivity of 0.17 ft/day is 2,034.9 cubic ft/day. <br />This value increases to a combined total of 3,352 cubic ft/day when using the higher hydraulic conductivity of 0.28 <br />ft/day. By using a total dissolved solid concentration of 2,392 mg/L in the Foidel Creek water, it is possible to <br />calculate a recharge to the sandstone that ranges from 137.8 kg/day to 227 kg/day. This is certainly a worst-case <br />scenario because the water in Foidel Creek is separated from the Twentymile Sandstone by a silty -clay that forms the <br />bed of the creek. It is estimated that a reduction from 50% to more than an order of magnitude could be expected <br />from the theoretical seepage calculation. Therefore, recharge of total dissolved solids should also be substantially <br />less than calculated. <br />Fractures are expected to form in the Twentymile Sandstone as subsidence occurs. These fractures would normally <br />increase the hydraulic conductivity and recharge to the sandstone. It is, however, expected that these fractures will <br />rapidly be filled with clay and silt from the streambed. <br />Sub Terra, the same consultant who prepared the subsidence predictions for Fish Creek, has prepared subsidence <br />predictions for the Easter Mining District. This work is presented in Exhibit 7E, Prediction of Subsidence, Eastern <br />Section of the Foidel Creek Mine. The subsidence predictions vary from .2 feet to 6 feet. This prediction is <br />presented in Table 19 and shown on Figure 17, Exhibit 7E. The valley floor is not actively managed, i.e.: no flood <br />irrigation network established, and therefore, will not cause any major disruption to the system. The most likely <br />effect will be a ponding of water within the subsided area, which should not cause any significant problems to the <br />grazing of the area. <br />• In reference to Middle Creek, subsidence will vary from .2 feet to 7.2 feet. This prediction is presented in Table 21 <br />and shown on Figure 19 in Exhibit 7E. The valley floor is managed the same as above and no major disruptions to <br />the system are anticipated from the subsidence in the area. A program will be developed for monitoring the <br />subsidence impacts to the valley floor. This program is detailed in the subsidence monitoring section of the permit <br />application. <br />NORTHERN MINING DISTRICT (12 Right through 16 Right) (PR99-05) <br />TCC's mining operation will result in subsiding Fish Creek and its alluvial valley floor. The impact to the ranches is <br />discussed in the following paragraphs. The ranches are shown on Map 1B. Given the fact that the valley floor will <br />subside the area will be flooded. TCC is not proposing any reclamation activities for the flooded areas. The extent <br />of flooding and loss of acreage is described in the following paragraphs. The extent of flooding is controlled by the <br />elevation overlying the gateroads and bank height immediately upstream from that point. <br />In reference to Fish Creek, Twentymile is of the opinion that its mining operation will not impact enough of the valley <br />floor to be significant to the ranching operation. Twentymile Coal Company, through its Trout Creek Ranch, <br />manages all of its lands, approximately 24,000 acres, for the grazing of cattle. Given the active status of its mining <br />operation, not all of this acreage is utilized for pasturing livestock. <br />Presently, there are no irrigation ditches established along Fish Creek, which irrigate a designated alluvial floor <br />within the limits of longwall panels 13 Right through 16 Right. This is due to the fact that it is not economically <br />feasible to establish an irrigation system on the limited acres formed by the <br />•extensive irrigation systems set up when the area was originally developed, i <br />segment of Fish Creek is not conducive to flood irrigation. <br />meandering Fish Creek. Given the <br />t is reasonable to conclude that this <br />i1 '.: , � `'.I -_ J U 6 4 [ 2.60 <br />PR 99-05 2.06-25 11/17/99 <br />