My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-05-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2016-05-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:21:43 PM
Creation date
6/17/2016 10:10:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/4/2016
Section_Exhibit Name
2.06 Special Categories of Mining
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
An arca in the Foidel Creek drainage in sections 21, 22 and 28 has been designated an alluvial vallev Floor <br />on the basis of the potential for subirrigation. The U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining, <br />• Division of Reclamation and Enforcement released in June 1985, Reconnaissance Maps to Assist in <br />Identifying Alluvial Valley Floors in Northwestern Colorado. The reconnaissance map of potential alluvial <br />valley floors for the Yampa and Danforth Hills Coal Field of Northwest Colorado (Eastern half) delineates <br />the subject area as having the potential for Flood irrigation but not for subirrigation. TCC has previously <br />submitted the results of a water availability investigation which demonstrates that there is insufficient <br />water available in the Foidel Creek drainage to support flood irrigation. <br />The evaluation of no subirrigation in the area is consistent with information submitted in the permit for the <br />Lckman Park Mine including an analysis of infra -red photography taken in September, 1978 which <br />showed no evidence of subirrigation in this area (Permit 979-177, pages 785-15 to 785-16). In addition, <br />TCC has recently acquired water quality information from the alluvial deposits in this area (P&M-1 <br />through P&M4, see Map 13, Twentymile Park Hydrology and Table 67, Alluvial Well Data for Sections <br />21, 22 and 28). This data indicates that salinity levels are several times higher than threshold levels at <br />which plant growth iS affected. <br />Several shallow boreholes (Auger I -Auger 5, See Map 13, Twentymile Park Hydrology) were drilled in the <br />vicinity of this alluvial valley on July 3, 1986 during construction of a powerline. These holes were used <br />to examine the nature of the alluvial deposits and the characteristics of the alluvial groundwater by TCC. <br />The alluvial deposits were observed to be almost entirely clays and silty clays presumably derived from <br />reworking of the underlying Lewis Shale unit (Table 68, Alluvial Drill Hole Logs). The alluvial deposits <br />were observed to yield very little water to the borehole, indicative of very low permeabilities typical of <br />clay materials. Inflows to the borehole were observed to be significant only after the boreholes penetrated <br />the underlying bedrock. Much of this flow was observed to occur at the alluvial/bedrock contact. <br />• Llectrical conductivity values of alluvial groundwater measured by TCC personnel on July 7, 1986 in <br />existing piezometers completed in the alluvium in one of the shallow boreholes and an existing large - <br />diameter dug well ranged from 598 to 5400 mmhos/cm (Table 67, Alluvial Well Data for Sections 21, 22 <br />and 28). These values are far in excess of threshold values for initiation of detrimental effects on plant <br />g,rowth according to CMLRD guidelines. The high solutes concentrations indicated by the electrical <br />conductivity values are believed to be a result of dissolution of minerals within the Lewis Shale material <br />which makes up the bulk of the alluvial deposits. <br />It is TCC's contention that the high salinities of alluvial groundwaters preclude the designation of this area <br />as an alluvial valley,floor as subirrigation will not benefit agricultural activities. Given that the current <br />solute concentrations in the alluvium of sections 21, 22, and 28 is higher than typical values of Foidel <br />Creek during the potential recharge period. TCC further contends that no detrimental effects to water <br />quality in the alluvium can occur as a result of operations of the Foidel Creek Mine. <br />Despite the evidence that subirrigation is probably not occurring in this area, the reach was examined to <br />investigate whether recharge of Foidel Creek waters during the spring runoff period might affect the <br />potential subirrigation function. A survey of the creek channel through this area was conducted by TCC <br />staff on time 30, 1986. The survey demonstrates that the alluvial deposits directly underlying the creek <br />channel consist of clays and silty clays which have very limited potential to allow significant recharge to <br />the adjacent alluvial deposits. <br />[lei ncability values for clay are in the range of 10-6 to 10-2 gals/day/ sq. ft. (Freeze and Cherry, 1979). <br />I'hc average width of the Foidel Creek channel through this reach is less than 5 feet. Measurements of <br />. Nk:ater levels in three existing piezometers, Table 67, Alluvial Well Data for Sections 21, 22 and 28, <br />indicate that hydraulic gradients in the alluvium are in the order of 0.01. A simple calculation using, the <br />MR 97-154 2.06-21 12/09/97 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.