My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-05-20_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2016-05-20_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:22:22 PM
Creation date
6/15/2016 9:46:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/20/2016
Doc Name
Citizen Complaint Federal Permit No. CO-0106A
From
Wild Earth Guardians
To
OSM
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DIH
RAR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
floors. An alluvial valley floor may exist south of the application area in Hay Gulch. It is not <br />anticipated that mining in the area will affect the possible alluvial vallei., floor at Hal' Gulch. <br />GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES <br />The only Mown mineral resource contained in the project area is coal. The coal deposits occur <br />within the Menefee Formation of the Cretaceous Mesa Verde Group and is within the Durango <br />Known Recoverable Coal Resource Area (KRCRA). <br />National King Coal is the only operating mine in the area at this time. There are no known oil and <br />gas deposits (NKOGD) in the proposed project area. However, oil and gas is Mown to occur in the <br />Point Lookout, Gallup, Dakota Sandstone and the Paradox Formations in other Southwestern <br />Colorado locations.. <br />The proposed project area is characterized by hilly plateau tops cut by two ephemeral drainages. The <br />elevation ranges from about 7,300 to 81200 feet. The geologic formations outcropping in the area <br />are the Cliff House Formation of the Cretaceous Mesa Verde Group and the overlying Quaternary <br />alluvial deposits. The coal proposed for mining is coal bed 1 in the Menefee Formation which <br />outcrops along the northwest boundary of the proposed lease area in the Fast Alkali Gulch drainage <br />and also to the southeast along an un -named gulch ("No Name Gulch'). <br />No quantitative data exists for subsidence on the proposed project area; however, the surface effects <br />of subsidence have been recorded on Federal leases P-058300, C-29125, and COC 49465 <br />approximately one mile south of the proposed project area. The overburden thickness consistently <br />ranges from 300 to 400 feet above coal bed 2 throughout the area of the existing leases as well as <br />in the proposed lease area. Subsidence is directly affected by the thickness of the coal seam mined <br />(4.5 to 7 feet), the overburden thickness, and overburden composition. Subsidence will show as <br />stress cracks up to a couple of inches wide. <br />A condition of approval of National King Coal's mine permit revision for Lease C-29125 and <br />subsequent permit revisions by Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology was that subsidence <br />would be monitored on a quarterly basis. The purpose of the monitoring was to determine if any new <br />subsidence was occurring and if the Huntington Ditch was being affected in any way. According to <br />National King Coal records (Second Quarter Monitoring, 1999), there are no new subsistence cracks <br />in the areas requiring monitoring to date. All areas, which lie above underground support pillars that <br />have been removed, continue to be monitored on a quarterly basis for evidence of material damage <br />to the surface. <br />Colorado Division ofMinerals and Geology ruses 2.05.6 and 4.20 require that "underground mining <br />activities shall be planned and conducted so as to prevent subsidence from causing material damage <br />to the surface." Materal darnage is deuned in Rule 2.05.6 with respect to subsidence as changes <br />which prevent restoration of affected structures and with respect to renewable resource lands; <br />chances which disrupt an aquifer, or a recharge area to an aquifer, which serves as a beneficial use <br />�� �`•�����• V :w�b^i , i`Yv �J V i VY� JVV�VJ Mt/V4 VJ -rV UC. "ir LVA a� JrN►S MI MI i�l4J. <br />There are no active faults adjacent to or on the project area (Zapp,1949). No other geologic hazards <br />a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.