Laserfiche WebLink
PERMIT#: M-1981-112 <br /> INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: ECS <br /> INSPECTION DATE: March 15,2016 <br /> OBSERVATIONS <br /> This was a monitoring inspection of the Builder's Aggregate Pit 112c permit conducted by Eric Scott of DRMS <br /> at 0930 on June 7, 2016. Permittee representative James Miner was present for the inspection. Also present <br /> for this inspection were Michael Stanley and Alex Kostra of the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACOE), and <br /> consultants to the permittee Dave Johnson and Steve Belz. The Builder's Aggregate Pit site is an 80 acre 112c <br /> permit with a current reclamation bond of$11,750. The approved post-mining land use is <br /> industrial/commercial. <br /> The previous method of mining at this site was suction dredging along the south bank of the Platte River from <br /> within the flood plain. However, according to the last annual report submitted by the permittee, the last date <br /> of excavation or processing at this site was July 2013. Since 2013, severe flood events on the Platte River have <br /> filled in the previous dredge pond, and a portion of the Platte River now flows through the previously active <br /> portion of the site (Photos 1, 5 and 6). The remaining accessible permit area has been used primarily as a <br /> resale point for imported material, and to recycle concrete and asphalt (Photos 3 and 4). The site will need to <br /> maintain mining-related activity (mining/sales/reclamation) at least every 180 days to avoid the requirement <br /> for the permit to be put into temporary cessation status. The current condition of the site is also summarized <br /> in the attached photos. <br /> There are several significant items that will need to be addressed before this site could resume operations as <br /> currently permitted. These requirements have been summarized on the first two pages of this report. The <br /> most important will be securing the necessary approvals for re-routing the river back to its pre-flood channel <br /> from the US Army Corps of Engineers (US ACOE), and exposure of groundwater from the Colorado State <br /> Engineer's Office Division of Water Resources (DWR). USACOE is currently reviewing a proposed plan <br /> submitted by the permittee's consultants to re-route the river to its previous location. USACOE stated that if <br /> the river is returned to its pre-flood channel, they would consider the remainder of the permit area to be <br /> "upland" area. This would allow for the dredge operation to resume in the area south of the re-channeled <br /> river. <br /> At this time Builder's Aggregate has no approved well permit or substitute water supply plan, therefore no <br /> groundwater may be exposed at this site until the appropriate permitting with the DWR is completed and <br /> evidence of this is submitted to DRMS. <br /> The previous dredge pond has been completely backfilled by the recent flood events, eliminating the previous <br /> groundwater exposure at the site. Due to the limited nature of the existing disturbance at the site at this time, <br /> and the approved post mining land use of industrial/commercial, the existing bond of$11,750 would be <br /> sufficient to complete reclamation at this time if required. If/when dredge operations and groundwater <br /> exposure are approved by the US ACOE and DWR, DRMS will need to be notified so that the required bonding <br /> for any authorized exposed groundwater can be addressed. Due to the location of this site, the only practical <br /> solution for exposed groundwater bonding will be to bond for complete backfill of any groundwater exposed <br /> by any future mining operations, or dedication of permittee owned rights to DWR to cover any exposure. The <br /> appropriate bond will need to be submitted to DRMS and approved prior to the commencement of any future <br /> dredge activity. <br /> Any designated wetlands present on the site will also need to be identified and clearly delineated so that they <br /> may be preserved. Any wetlands disturbed will need to be mitigated appropriately through an approved US <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />