My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-06-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2016-06-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:22:52 PM
Creation date
6/2/2016 6:56:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/1/2016
Doc Name
Petition For Cease and Desist Order and Request For Hearing
From
Law Offices of Luke J. Danielson P.C.
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
MPB
DIH
RAR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Carl 8 Mount, 6175 W Ohio Ave, Lakewood, CO 80226 <br />Second, obtain a full elemental characterization of the waste material to include geochemistry and <br />mineralogical data in order to help determine static levels of waste solubility. Organic constituents most <br />likely present in the coal mine waste should be added to the required characterization. Standardized <br />tests must be used to provide relevant data (see GARD Guide, 2016). <br />If warranted by the static tests, conduct humidity cell tests of the waste material to determine long- <br />term estimations of the weathering, neutralization, and leaching potential of the waste material. This is <br />imperative since the waste pile will essentially be left in place long after the mine is gone and the <br />reclamation bond is returned. Pollutants may continue to leach from the pile for years after the mine is <br />closed unless a proper design for containment is implemented. It is impossible to evaluate the waste <br />pile design for proper containment without this vital information (static and kinetic waste <br />characterization information) especially in light of the newest GCC proposal under TR20 to actually <br />reduce the four foot plant growth medium cover requirement to a mere two feet. Two feet of cover <br />material, depending on water holding capacity of the material, most likely will not even hold the average <br />annual moisture recharge to the soil from snowmelt and precipitation. <br />Finally, require and immediately implement a water monitoring system that effectively monitors <br />quantity and quality of surface water runoff or leachate from the waste pile and thus, the effectiveness <br />of the waste pile design. The design cannot possibly be evaluated or determined after waste placement <br />without an effective water monitoring system that ensures that design parameters were followed and <br />are working correctly. <br />GCC should further specify where mine waste is being stored within the mine permit area and the <br />nature of that material (whole elemental analysis, geochemistry, mineralogy, humidity cell tests, <br />monitoring). It is unclear whether the mine waste pile near the King I portal is the only area in which <br />mine waste is being stored or disposed. It is possible that mine waste is being stored in underground <br />sections of the King I and King 11 mines and, if so, these areas should be evaluated and monitored as <br />well. <br />Sincerely, <br />Carl B. Mount, M.S. <br />6175 W Ohio Ave <br />Lakewood, CO 80226 <br />M(, Lvkc Danielson, l' sq, Page 4 <br />King I and It Mine %fatpir and Coal Minp Wastp Concerns <br />May 11, 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.