My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-05-04_REVISION - C1982056 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2016-05-04_REVISION - C1982056 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:21:44 PM
Creation date
5/6/2016 1:57:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/4/2016
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings
From
DRMS
To
Twentymile Coal, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR10
Email Name
JLE
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
On the Trout Creek AVF, the applicant sampled vegetative cover within a number <br />of farmed fields as denoted on Map No. 1 of Exhibit 42. Vegetative production, as <br />well as cover, was sampled in one field (Pasture 11). A majority of the species on <br />the AVF would be considered moderately tolerant, and on an acreage weighted <br />basis only 18.4% of the cover was made up of moderately sensitive species <br />(salinity threshold reached at root zone soil saturated paste extract electrical <br />conductivity of 1.5 mmhos/cm). A number of the species encountered have not <br />been ranked by Maas and Hoffman, and other references were consulted. In <br />general, Aveneae tribe grasses and Trifolium species were considered to be <br />moderately sensitive, while Triticeae, Stipeae, and Poeae tribe grasses (with the <br />exception of Dactylis) were considered to be moderately tolerant. Carex and <br />Juncus species were also considered to be moderately tolerant. <br />Estimates submitted by the applicant project mining will impact Trout Creek water <br />salinity, producing EC levels in the vicinity of 1.23 mmhos/cm (1230 umhos/cm X <br />.73 ratio = 922 mg/l TDS). Assuming that a root zone saturated extract soil <br />salinity of 1.845 mmhos/cm would result from flood irrigation water with a <br />specific conductance of 1.23 mmhos/cm, some decrease in crop production would <br />be expected. The assumed relationship between irrigation water salinity and root <br />zone soil salinity is within the typical range reported in USDA Handbook 60. <br />Based on leaching calculations included in the TCC permit application, and on soil <br />sampling conducted on the Fish Creek AVF by the Division, the 1.5:1 relationship <br />(soil salinity/irrigation water salinity) is considered conservative. However, the <br />applicant previously submitted vegetation data for irrigated areas on Trout Creek <br />(Exhibit 42) that demonstrate that moderately sensitive species comprise a very <br />small portion of the total vegetative production on those areas irrigated <br />downstream of the Foidel Creek mine. The applicant also points out that irrigation <br />water is applied in excess of what is necessary for the species grown, and this <br />excess leaches the soil profile, thus making the assumed relationship between soil <br />salinity and irrigation water salinity a worst case assumption. The applicant <br />proposes that no decrease in production of any of the species currently grown on <br />the Trout Creek AVF would be expected unless the conductivity of the irrigation <br />water were to exceed 1 mmhos/cm. Based on species composition data submitted, <br />the applicant predicts that significant production decreases (>3% for a farm unit) <br />would not occur unless irrigation water salinity were to exceed 2.0 mmhos/cm. <br />Given the factors involved, the Division finds it is appropriate to propose an <br />irrigation water material damage suspect level of 1.5 mmhos/cm for Trout Creek, <br />from the confluence of Middle Creek to the Yampa River. Establishing the <br />suspect level at 1.5 mmhos/cm acknowledges the evidence submitted by the <br />applicant while maintaining a reasonable suspect level established through <br />research and application. <br />As a result of TR -32, the applicant received approval of a plan to discharge mine <br />water only when the stream has the dilution capacity to maintain waters at or <br />below the discharge points on Fish Creek and Trout Creek to 1.5 mmhos/cm. In <br />summary, projected flood irrigation water quality is 1.230 mmhos/cm and material <br />Page 48 of 52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.