Laserfiche WebLink
King Coal Mine (C-1981-035) TR -24 Adequacy Review #2 Response <br />o All elevation values should read from left to right with map facing up. Maybe offset them <br />from each other a bit. <br />o Make sure each map has a properly oriented North arrow. <br />o Please, call out the map scale e.g. I " = 100' or whatever it is. <br />The maps listed in your table (shown below) have been reviewed to address the <br />issues listed above. <br />King maps received: <br />King I maps received: <br />II maps received <br />001 Permit and <br />—King <br />Colors between OSMRE PAP <br />Colors between OSMRE <br />Adjacent areas <br />are not discernibly different: <br />PAP are not discernibly <br />Please make them different <br />different: Please make them <br />colors. The colors have been <br />different colors. The colors <br />changed as requested. <br />have been changed as <br />re uested. <br />002 (Surface <br />Please make sure ownership <br />Please make sure ownership <br />Ownership) <br />information is not obscured by <br />information is not obscured <br />other symbology on top of it. <br />by other symbology on top <br />Also please make sure all <br />of it. Also please make sure <br />ownership text is placed <br />all ownership text is placed <br />horizontally. Text and <br />horizontally. Text and <br />symbology has been <br />symbology has been <br />corrected as requested. <br />corrected as requested. <br />003 (Coal <br />Please make sure ownership <br />Please make sure ownership <br />Ownership) <br />information is not obscured by <br />information is not obscured <br />other symbology on top of it. <br />by other symbology on top <br />Text and symbology has <br />of it. Text and symbology <br />been corrected as requested. <br />has been corrected as <br />re uested. <br />006 (Soils, <br />For legibility would it be <br />For legibility would it be <br />Vegetation and Land <br />possible to reduce the size and <br />possible to reduce the size <br />Use) <br />boldness of Soils, vegetation <br />and boldness of Soils, <br />and Land Use fonts? Please <br />vegetation and Land Use <br />remove (as much as possiblefonts? <br />Please remove (as <br />without loss of clarity) from <br />much as possible without <br />each polygon the duplicate <br />loss of clarity) from each <br />labels of Soil Type, Vegetation <br />polygon the duplicate labels <br />and Land Use. Also, please <br />of Soil Type, Vegetation and <br />increase the font size in the <br />Land Use. Also, please <br />legend of the soil type, <br />increase the font size in the <br />vegetation and land use text. <br />legend of the soil type, <br />Please assure that text is not <br />vegetation and land use text. <br />obscured by symbology <br />Please assure that text is <br />placed on top of it. Place <br />not obscured by symbology <br />permit and affected area <br />placed on top of it. Place <br />boundaries under the soils <br />permit and affected area <br />symbology (can you keep the <br />boundaries under the soils <br />boundary text above the soil <br />symbology (can you keep <br />type?). Can the three <br />the boundary text above the <br />vegetation types be <br />soil type?). Can the three <br />symbolized by a thick line <br />vegetation types be <br />enclosing the polygons (a <br />symbolized by a thick line <br />