Laserfiche WebLink
Case 16-42529 Doc 149 Filed 04/15/16 Entered 04/15/16 16:16:59 Main Document <br />Pg 43 of 71 <br />Claims with consideration other than cash to the extent that Required Pre -Petition <br />Lenders agree to payment of any Senior Lender 507(b) Adequate Protection Claims in <br />consideration other than cash pursuant to such plan of reorganization, (ii) that the mix of <br />non-cash consideration used to satisfy any Noteholder 507(b) Adequate Protection <br />Claims shall be the same as the mix of non-cash consideration used to satisfy any Senior <br />Lender 507(b) Adequate Protection Claims unless the Required Second Lien Noteholders <br />consent to different treatment by accepting the proposed plan of reorganization and (iii) <br />unless otherwise expressly agreed to in writing by the DIP Agent, the Second Lien <br />Secured Parties shall not receive or retain any payments, property or other amounts in <br />respect of the superpriority claims under section 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code granted <br />hereunder or under the Existing Credit Documents unless and until the DIP Obligations <br />have indefeasibly been paid in cash in full in accordance with the DIP Documents (the <br />"Noteholder 507(b) Adequate Protection Claim" and, together with the Senior Lender <br />507(b) Adequate Protection Claim, the "507(b) Claims"). <br />15. Reservation of Rights of Pre -Petition Secured Parties. Under the circumstances <br />and given that the above-described adequate protection is consistent with the Bankruptcy Code, <br />including, without limitation, section 506(b) thereof, the Court finds that the adequate <br />protection provided herein, including, without limitation, in the form of the Adequate <br />Protection Obligations and Adequate Protection Liens is reasonable and sufficient to protect <br />the interests of the Pre -Petition Secured Parties; provided that any of the Pre -Petition Secured <br />Parties may request further or different adequate protection, and the Debtors or any other party <br />may, consistent with the terms of the ICA (the terms of which, for the avoidance of any doubt, <br />shall not be affected or modified in any way by this Interim Order) or any other Existing <br />43 <br />