Laserfiche WebLink
Case 16-42529 Doc 28 Filed 04/13/16 Entered 04/13/16 11:32:40 Main Document <br />Pg 21 of 31 <br />(Bankr. E.D. Mo. Feb. 10, 2016) (Docket No. 96) (order authorizing the debtors to pay 20 -day <br />administrative claims to certain essential suppliers in their discretion without the need for further <br />court approval); In re Arch Coal, Inc., No. 16-40120 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Jan. 13, 2016) <br />(Docket No. 71) (same); accord In re Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., No. 15-23007 (Bankr. S. D.N.Y. <br />July 20, 2015 and Aug. 11, 2015) (Docket Nos. 61 and 503) (interim and final orders authorizing <br />the debtors to pay 20 -day administrative claims in their discretion without the need for further <br />court approval); In re Patriot Coal Corp., No. 15-32450 (Bankr. E.D. Va. May 13, 2015 and <br />June 4, 2015) (Docket Nos. 51 and 236) (same); In re James River Coal Co., No. 14-31848 <br />(Bankr. E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2014 and May 9, 2014) (Docket Nos. 81 and 243) (same); In re AMF <br />Bowling Worldwide, Inc., No. 12-36495 (Bankr. E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 2012) (Docket No. 57) <br />(order authorizing the debtors to pay 20 -day administrative claims in their discretion without the <br />need for further court approval); In re Patriot Coal Corp., No. 12-12900 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. <br />July 16, 2012 and Aug. 2, 2012) (Docket Nos. 88 and 257) (interim and final orders authorizing <br />the debtors to pay 20 -day administrative claims in their discretion without the need for further <br />court approval); In re Chrysler LLC, No. 09-50002 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 5, 2009 and <br />May 20, 2009) (Docket Nos. 358 and Docket No. 1318) (same). <br />The Repudiating Vendor Procedures Should Be Authorized <br />43. The Debtors further request authorization to implement the Repudiating Vendor <br />Procedures. A number of the Debtors' suppliers, including some of the Debtors' largest suppliers, <br />are parties to supply agreements with the Debtors. "After a debtor commences a Chapter 11 <br />proceeding, but before executory contracts are assumed or rejected under § 365(a), those <br />contracts remain in existence, enforceable by the debtor but not against the debtor." United <br />States ex rel U.S. Postal Serv. v. Dewey Freight Sys., Inc., 31 F.3d 620, 624 (8th Cir. 1994). See <br />-21- <br />