My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982056 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2016-04-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982056 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:21:05 PM
Creation date
4/26/2016 1:13:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/25/2016
Doc Name
Motion of the Debtors and Debtors in Possession Pursuant to Sections
From
United State Bankruptcy
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
MPB
JRS
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 16-42529 Doc 28 Filed 04/13/16 Entered 04/13/16 11:32:40 Main Document <br />Pg 21 of 31 <br />(Bankr. E.D. Mo. Feb. 10, 2016) (Docket No. 96) (order authorizing the debtors to pay 20 -day <br />administrative claims to certain essential suppliers in their discretion without the need for further <br />court approval); In re Arch Coal, Inc., No. 16-40120 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Jan. 13, 2016) <br />(Docket No. 71) (same); accord In re Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., No. 15-23007 (Bankr. S. D.N.Y. <br />July 20, 2015 and Aug. 11, 2015) (Docket Nos. 61 and 503) (interim and final orders authorizing <br />the debtors to pay 20 -day administrative claims in their discretion without the need for further <br />court approval); In re Patriot Coal Corp., No. 15-32450 (Bankr. E.D. Va. May 13, 2015 and <br />June 4, 2015) (Docket Nos. 51 and 236) (same); In re James River Coal Co., No. 14-31848 <br />(Bankr. E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2014 and May 9, 2014) (Docket Nos. 81 and 243) (same); In re AMF <br />Bowling Worldwide, Inc., No. 12-36495 (Bankr. E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 2012) (Docket No. 57) <br />(order authorizing the debtors to pay 20 -day administrative claims in their discretion without the <br />need for further court approval); In re Patriot Coal Corp., No. 12-12900 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. <br />July 16, 2012 and Aug. 2, 2012) (Docket Nos. 88 and 257) (interim and final orders authorizing <br />the debtors to pay 20 -day administrative claims in their discretion without the need for further <br />court approval); In re Chrysler LLC, No. 09-50002 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 5, 2009 and <br />May 20, 2009) (Docket Nos. 358 and Docket No. 1318) (same). <br />The Repudiating Vendor Procedures Should Be Authorized <br />43. The Debtors further request authorization to implement the Repudiating Vendor <br />Procedures. A number of the Debtors' suppliers, including some of the Debtors' largest suppliers, <br />are parties to supply agreements with the Debtors. "After a debtor commences a Chapter 11 <br />proceeding, but before executory contracts are assumed or rejected under § 365(a), those <br />contracts remain in existence, enforceable by the debtor but not against the debtor." United <br />States ex rel U.S. Postal Serv. v. Dewey Freight Sys., Inc., 31 F.3d 620, 624 (8th Cir. 1994). See <br />-21- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.