Laserfiche WebLink
Case 16-42529 Doc 53 Filed 04/13/16 Entered 04/13/16 12:50:57 Main Document <br />Pg 17 of 31 <br />2003), Richmond Leasing Co. v. Capital Bank, N.A., 762 F.2d 1303, 1309 (5th Cir. 1985) and In <br />re Defender Drug Stores, Inc., 145 B.R. 312, 317 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1992)). See also Crystalin, <br />L.L.C. v. Selma Props. Inc. (In re Crystalin, L.L.C.), 293 B.R. 455, 463-64 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2003) <br />(holding that the business judgment rule may be satisfied "'as long as the proposed action qppears <br />to enhance the debtor's estate."') (quoting Four B. Corp. v. Food Barn Stores, Inc. (In re Food <br />Barn Stores, Inc.), 107 F.3d 558, 567 n.16 (8th Cir. 1997) (emphasis in original, internal <br />quotations and alteration omitted)); Four B. Corp. v. Food Barn Stores, Inc. (In re Food Barn <br />Stores, Inc.), 107 F.3d 558, 567 n.16 (8th Cir. 1997) (holding that "[w]here the [debtor's] request <br />is not manifestly unreasonable or made in bad faith, the court should normally grant approval 'as <br />long as the proposed action appears to enhance the debtor's estate"') (quoting Richmond Leasing <br />Co. v. Capital Bank, N.A., 762 F.2d 1303, 1309 (5th Cir. 1985) (internal alterations and <br />quotations omitted)); Official Comm. of Subordinated Bondholders v. Integrated Res Inc (In re <br />Integrated Res., Inc.), 147 B.R. 650, 656 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) (finding that "[c]ourts are loath to <br />interfere with corporate decisions absent a showing of bad faith, self-interest, or gross <br />negligence"). <br />34. The Debtors believe, in their business judgment, that maintaining their <br />Insurance Policies and Workers' Compensation Program is sound and prudent. For example, <br />the Debtors are required by applicable state laws and the Black Lung Benefits Act to maintain <br />their Workers' Compensation Program. Failure to comply with this requirement can result in <br />civil or criminal liability and, possibly, suspension of the Debtors' ability to continue their <br />business operations. See, e.g., COLO. REv. STAT. ANN. § 8-43-304(a) (failure comply with <br />Colorado workers' compensation statutes may result in monetary liability for officers); COLO. <br />REv. STAT. ANN. § 8-43-409 (failure to maintain insurance as required by Colorado workers' <br />-17- <br />