My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1994082 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2016-04-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1994082 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:21:08 PM
Creation date
4/26/2016 9:59:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/25/2016
Doc Name
Motion of the Debtors and Debtors in Possession
From
United States Bankruptcy Court
To
DRNS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
MPB
JRS
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 16-42529 Doc 32 Filed 04/13/16 Entered 04/13/16 11:43:47 Main Document <br />Pg7of21 <br />Asbestos Related Litigants v. Johns Manville Corp. (In re Johns -Manville Corp2, 60 B.R. 612, <br />617 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1986) (finding that "the nature of the debtor's business prior to its Chapter <br />11 filing is compared to its course of conduct postpetition"). In determining whether a <br />transaction is ordinary, two relevant factors are the type of business a debtor is engaged in as <br />well as the size and nature of the business and transaction in question. In re H&S Transp. Co., <br />115 B.R. at 598. The Debtors will generally enter into transactions with ADM under the ADM <br />Agreement of the same type as the prepetition transactions. Furthermore, the size and nature of <br />the transactions will be similar to the prepetition activities, as will the Debtors' reasons for <br />entering into the transactions. <br />16. As noted above, the Debtors believe that they are authorized to enter into <br />transactions under the ADM Agreement in the ordinary course without further order of this <br />Court. Although the Debtors believe that consummation of the transactions under the ADM <br />Agreement is within the ordinary course of their businesses and that they can consummate these <br />transactions without notice and a hearing, the Debtors nevertheless request that the Court enter <br />an order authorizing them to enter into and perform under these transactions, in part because <br />ADM may be unwilling to take any "risk" on the "ordinary course issue" fearing that any <br />postpetition transaction may later be avoided under section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code. <br />Alternatively, if the transactions under the ADM Agreement are deemed or determined not to be <br />in the ordinary course of the Debtors' businesses, then the Debtors request that the Court enter an <br />order pursuant to section 363(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code authorizing the Debtors to enter into <br />transactions and perform under the ADM Agreement on a post-petition basis. <br />17. Section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code allows the debtors, after notice and <br />hearing, to "use, sell, or lease, other than in the ordinary course of business, property of the <br />7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.