My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1992081 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1992081
>
2016-04-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1992081 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:21:07 PM
Creation date
4/26/2016 9:59:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/25/2016
Doc Name
Motion of the Debtors and Debtors in Possession
From
United States Bankruptcy Court
To
DRNS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
MPB
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 16-42529 Doc 32 Filed 04/13/16 Entered 04/13/16 11:43:47 Main Document <br />Pg9of21 <br />Bank, N.A., 762 F.2d 1303, 1309 (5th Cir. 1985) and In re Defender Drug Stores, Inc., 145 B.R. <br />312, 317 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1992)). See also Crystalin, L.L.C. v. Selma Props. Inc. (In re <br />Crystalin, L.L.C.), 293 B.R. 455, 463-64 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2003) (holding that the business <br />judgment rule may be satisfied "'as long as the proposed action appears to enhance the debtor's <br />estate."') (quoting Four B. Corp. v. Food Barn Stores, Inc. (In re Food Barn Stores Inc.), 107 <br />F.3d 558, 567 n.16 (8th Cir. 1997)) (emphasis in original, internal quotations and alterations <br />omitted); Four B. Corp. v. Food Barn Stores, Inc. (In re Food Barn Stores Inc.), 107 F.3d 558, <br />567 n.16 (8th Cir. 1997) (holding that "[w]here the [debtor's] request is not manifestly <br />unreasonable or made in bad faith, the court should normally grant approval 'as long as the <br />proposed action appears to enhance the debtor's estate"') (quoting Richmond Leasing Co. v. <br />Capital Bank, N.A., 762 F.2d 1303, 1309 (5th Cir. 1985) (internal alterations and quotations <br />omitted)); Official Comm. Of Subordinated Bondholders v. Integrated Res. Inc (In re Integrated <br />Res. Inc.), 147 B.R. 650, 656 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) (finding that "[c]ourts are loath to interfere with <br />corporate decisions absent a showing of bad faith, self-interest, or gross negligence"). <br />19. The Debtors submit that the requested relief represents a sound exercise of their <br />business judgment, is necessary to avoid immediate and irreparable harm and is justified under <br />sections 105(a) and 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. If authorization to perform and enter into <br />transactions under the ADM Agreement is not granted, the Debtors will be at a financial <br />disadvantage vis-a-vis their competitors, and the Debtors will be unable to take advantage of <br />their expertise in the industry and the common industry practice employed to hedge risk and <br />manage expenses. As such, the Debtors respectfully request the entry of an order providing that <br />the Debtors are authorized to enter into and consummate transactions under the ADM Agreement <br />without further order of the Court. <br />KIM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.