My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1992081 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1992081
>
2016-04-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1992081 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:21:07 PM
Creation date
4/26/2016 9:59:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/25/2016
Doc Name
Motion of the Debtors and Debtors in Possession
From
United States Bankruptcy Court
To
DRNS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
MPB
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 16-42529 Doc 32 Filed 04/13/16 Entered 04/13/16 11:43:47 Main Document <br />Pg7of21 <br />Asbestos Related Litigants v. Johns Manville Corp. (In re Johns -Manville Corp2, 60 B.R. 612, <br />617 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1986) (finding that "the nature of the debtor's business prior to its Chapter <br />11 filing is compared to its course of conduct postpetition"). In determining whether a <br />transaction is ordinary, two relevant factors are the type of business a debtor is engaged in as <br />well as the size and nature of the business and transaction in question. In re H&S Transp. Co., <br />115 B.R. at 598. The Debtors will generally enter into transactions with ADM under the ADM <br />Agreement of the same type as the prepetition transactions. Furthermore, the size and nature of <br />the transactions will be similar to the prepetition activities, as will the Debtors' reasons for <br />entering into the transactions. <br />16. As noted above, the Debtors believe that they are authorized to enter into <br />transactions under the ADM Agreement in the ordinary course without further order of this <br />Court. Although the Debtors believe that consummation of the transactions under the ADM <br />Agreement is within the ordinary course of their businesses and that they can consummate these <br />transactions without notice and a hearing, the Debtors nevertheless request that the Court enter <br />an order authorizing them to enter into and perform under these transactions, in part because <br />ADM may be unwilling to take any "risk" on the "ordinary course issue" fearing that any <br />postpetition transaction may later be avoided under section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code. <br />Alternatively, if the transactions under the ADM Agreement are deemed or determined not to be <br />in the ordinary course of the Debtors' businesses, then the Debtors request that the Court enter an <br />order pursuant to section 363(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code authorizing the Debtors to enter into <br />transactions and perform under the ADM Agreement on a post-petition basis. <br />17. Section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code allows the debtors, after notice and <br />hearing, to "use, sell, or lease, other than in the ordinary course of business, property of the <br />7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.