My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-20_INSPECTION - M1981004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1981004
>
2016-04-20_INSPECTION - M1981004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:20:58 PM
Creation date
4/21/2016 8:15:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981004
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
4/20/2016
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Dilleys Sand & Gravel
Inspection Date
4/14/2016
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERMIT#: M-1981-004 <br /> INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: ECS <br /> INSPECTION DATE: April 14,2016 <br /> INSPECTION TOPIC: Revegetation <br /> PROBLEM/POSSIBLE VIOLATION: Problem: There are state-listed "list -A" noxious weeds present on site <br /> (Myrtle Spurge - photo 2). This is a problem for failure to employ weed control methods for state listed noxious <br /> weed species within the permitted area, and to reduce the spread of weeds to nearby areas as required by <br /> Section 3.1.10 (6) of the rule. <br /> CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: Implement a weed control plan and provide proof to the Division that this has been <br /> done. If a weed control plan is not already in place, the operator shall develop a weed control and management <br /> plan in accordance with Section 3.1.10 (6) of the Rule. This plan should be developed in consultation with the <br /> county extension agency, or weed control district office and should include specific control measures to be <br /> applied, a schedule for when control measures will be applied and a post-treatment monitoring plan. This weed <br /> control plan shall be submitted to the Division as a Technical Revision to the approved plan with the appropriate <br /> Technical Revision fee of$216.00 by the corrective action date. <br /> CORRECTIVE ACTION DUE DATE: 5/06/16 <br /> INSPECTION TOPIC: Signs & Markers <br /> PROBLEM/POSSIBLE VIOLATION: Problem: The affected area boundary markers are missing or incorrectly <br /> placed. This is a problem for failure to maintain boundary markers around the affected area as required by <br /> Section 3.1.12(2) of the rule. <br /> CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: The operator shall conduct a survey and replace the boundary markers in the correct <br /> location(s). The operator shall provide proof to the Division that this has been done and submit a new permit <br /> boundary map sealed by a registered surveyor showing the permit boundary and affected area by the corrective <br /> action date. <br /> CORRECTIVE ACTION DUE DATE: 5/31/16 <br /> GENERAL INSPECTION TOPICS <br /> The following list identifies the environmental and permit parameters inspected and gives a categorical evaluation of each <br /> (AR)RECORDS Y (FN) FINANCIAL WARRANTY PB (RD) ROADS NA <br /> (HB) HYDROLOGIC BALANCE Y (BG) BACKFILL& GRADING Y (EX) EXPLOSIVES NA <br /> (PW) PROCESSING WASTE/TAILING---- NA (SF) PROCESSING FACILITIES NA (TS)TOPSOIL Y <br /> (MP)GENL MINE PLAN COMPLIANCE- PB (FW) FISH&WILDLIFE NA (RV) REVEGETATION---- PB <br /> (SM)SIGNS AND MARKERS PB (SW) STORM WATER MGT PLAN----NA (CI)COMPLETE INSP---- Y <br /> (ES)OVERBURDEN/DEV.WASTE NA (SC) EROSION/SEDIMENTATION--- NA (RS) RECL PLAN/COMP--NA <br /> (AT)ACID OR TOXIC MATERIALS NA (OD)OFF-SITE DAMAGE Y (ST) STIPULATIONS NA <br /> V=Inspected and found in compliance/N=Not inspected/NA=Not applicable to this operation/PB=Problem cited/PV=Possible violation cited <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.