My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-15_PERMIT FILE - M2016009 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2016009
>
2016-04-15_PERMIT FILE - M2016009 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2020 10:13:30 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 6:15:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2016009
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/15/2016
Doc Name
Objection Letter
From
David Cockrell
To
DRMS
Email Name
TOD
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
David CocLrell <br /> 2-25 Midnight Ave. <br /> Pueblo,CO 8 1005 <br /> RECEIVED <br /> APR 15 ?016 <br /> April 15, 2016 DIVISION OF RECLAMATION <br /> MININGAND SAFETY <br /> Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> 1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> Dear Sirs: <br /> I write in opposition to the application of Fremont Paving and Redi-Mix, Inc.for a Construction Materials <br /> Operation Reclamation Permit for a surface mine on 44th Lane in Pueblo County, Colorado. <br /> My concerns regarding the proposed mine center on its likely impacts to the surrounding farming <br /> operations. These impacts will certainly involve fugitive dust,truck traffic,the loss of organic soil on the <br /> site, and subsequent persisting erosion problems. Perhaps most important are the potential impacts of <br /> leaching of mine water into the relatively shallow tributary aquifer at this location, both during and <br /> subsequent to the mine's operations. <br /> This area of Pueblo County(the St. Charles Mesa) is one of the most fertile and valuable irrigated <br /> farming regions in the state. Because of this,the impacts of industrial activities on 1,471 acres adjacent <br /> to the Bessemer Ditch in this area are especially detrimental. We urge you to reject this application <br /> based on the sensitivity and highest and best use of this land. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> David Cockrell, Ph.D. <br /> Ph. J 1 9.994.3278 davidco&re110comca5t.net <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.