My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-14_REPORT - M19741004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M19741004
>
2016-04-14_REPORT - M19741004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2020 10:38:35 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 6:13:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1974004
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/14/2016
Doc Name
Annual Fee, Report & Map
From
Specification Aggregates Quarry
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2016
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Martin Marietta Materials <br /> Spec-Agg 2016 Annual Report <br /> As excavation proceeds for West Wall 3, additional measurements are needed to refine the <br /> representative discontinuity orientations of these joint and foliation sets in this area to evaluate their <br /> potential contribute to large-scale slope failure modes. <br /> 6.4.5 Southern Walls <br /> For the 2016 Annual Report, we analyzed four southern wall orientations based on the locations shown in <br /> Figure 2 and Table 2: Southwest Walls 1 and 2, the South Wall, and the Southeast Wall. The wall <br /> locations and orientations for the Southwest and Southeast Walls correspond to the same wall locations <br /> and orientations analyzed in previous annual reports (Figure 2). <br /> The stereonet plots for Southwest Walls 1 and 2 do not show indications of potential planar or wedge <br /> failure modes based on the 2015 discontinuity measurements (Figure 13). However, even a slight <br /> variability of the joint sets P-2 and P-4 will have potential to form wedges within the critical zone for these <br /> walls. <br /> The stereonet plot for the South and Southeast Wall shows one discontinuity intersection that falls within <br /> the critical zone, suggesting that wedge failure is kinematically possible for this slope orientation (Figures <br /> 14 and 15). The intersecting sets that may result in wedge failure includes joint sets P-3 and P-6. The <br /> signatures of P-6 appears to be relatively strong in the Southern Expansion Area (Figure 6) based on the <br /> 2013-2014 and 2015 data. The development and size of wedge failures will be controlled by the <br /> variability and limited lateral extent of the discontinuities. As excavation proceeds for the Southern Walls, <br /> additional measurements are needed to refine the representative discontinuity orientations of these joint <br /> and foliation sets in this area to evaluate their potential contribute to large-scale slope failure modes. <br /> 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> The results of the structural geologic evaluations and kinematic structural discontinuity analyses for the <br /> Spec-Agg Quarry do not indicate any immediate concerns with respect to large-scale instabilities in the <br /> current final quarry wall faces based on our field observations and current rock mass assumptions. The <br /> stability of the slopes is enhanced by the absence of significant hydrostatic pressure, by current mining <br /> procedures, and by the current reclamation process being implemented by Martin Marietta at the site. <br /> While large-scale failures are not anticipated, the slope will continue to shed rocks (minor raveling) over <br /> time as a result of small-scale failures (planar or wedge failure), particularly in near-vertical temporary <br /> bench faces. <br /> For the 2016 Annual Report, kinematic analyses are based on discontinuity measurements derived <br /> principally from data collected from the existing growing dataset supplemented with data collected during <br /> the July and December 2015 site visits. The results of these analyses are not intended to supersede <br /> results of analyses performed for prior years that were based on representative discontinuity orientations <br /> generated from the entire set of measurements. Rather the analyses presented herein are meant to <br /> compliment previous years' analyses and enable monitoring of possible new trends in the data that could <br /> result in previously unconsidered failure modes. <br /> The collected data for this evaluation was complimentary to and were consistent with past analyses. It is <br /> noted that the results for the current analysis did not change the pole or the resultant concentration center <br /> for any of the delineated joint sets significantly from any of the recent years' results. In general, the data <br /> collected during the July and December 2015 site visits correspond reasonably well with representative <br /> February 8, 2016 Page 11 Lachel & Associates, Inc. <br /> Project 15364004.00 02016 All Rights Reserved <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.